![]() |
Color Modification of Post Consumer Glass Cullet |
|
|
| The Recycling Technology Assistance
Partnership (ReTAP) is an affiliate of the national Manufacturing Extension
Partnershiup (NIST MEP), a program
of the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology.
The MEP is a growing nationwide network of extension services to
help smaller U.S. manufacturers improve their performance and become more
competitive. Other major support comes from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyand the American
Plastics Council |
LINKS
This report contains links to
outside resources and documents that are pertinent to the context of the information
in this report. The following list will
take you to the point in the report where you can use each link:
CWC
(formerly the Clean Washington Center)
The Pacific Northwest Economic
Region (PNWER)
Environmental Protection
Agency
NIST
Manufacturers’ Extension Service
A CWC report on batch modifications
for recycled glass
Recycled container glass is generally available in only clear, amber, and green. The lack of availability of a fuller color pallet is a barrier to the use of recycled container glass by small-scale businesses remelting glass for casting or pressing. The use by small businesses of recycled container glass could help to increase the market options available for recyclers, especially in rural areas. The Recycling Technology Assistance Partnership conducted a technology validation project in 1995 to demonstrate that by re-melting brown and green cullet and modifying its chemistry, a broad range of colors can be produced. Pressed glass tile manufacturing, in particular, has been identified by the Clean Washington Center as a potential high-value market for recycled glass.[1] In the course of the study, separate batches of 25 to 30 pounds each of cullet were melted, pressed into four-inch square tile molds, and annealed. Nine transparent colors, two blacks, and a series of opals were produced using green, brown and clear bottle cullet. Each formula was evaluated for workability, color and melt quality, and formula economy.
This protocol reviews basic methods of
decolorizing brown and green bottle cullet, and summarizes the details of the
prototype melts described above, in the following five sections:
¨
Brown Bottle Cullet
¨ Green Bottle Cullet
¨ Opal Glasses
¨ Experimental Procedure
¨
Color Modification Formulas
Although resulting colors will vary widely depending on the source of
glass cullet, furnace conditions, and the chemical additions used, the
procedures presented here may
help to make
post - consumer glass a more attractive feedstock for
small hot-glass operations.
Project Background
Prior to conducting the
prototype melts, a literature search was performed, previously tested methods of color modification were reviewed,
and a series of small lab melts were conducted to test various formulas of
interest.
The properties of available
glasses and melting procedures were then reviewed by a panel of business,
market, and technical glass experts to establish testing priorities for
prototype melts. Classes of chemical
modifications were chosen based on their recommendations and a search of
relevant literature.
Chemical batch modifications
for improving the workability of recycled glass are described in another CWC report.
Brown Bottle
Cullet
Brown bottle glass is
produced with a sulfur-iron colloidal solution under reducing conditions. Brown
bottle cullet can be decolorized by taking advantage of the greater affinity of
the S‑ anion, called a ligand, for the free Zn 2+
ion over the free Fe 2+ ion.
At a certain level of zinc oxide, brown glass will be decolorized to a
neutral blue/green hue glass, due to the free ion of Fe 2+. Erbium
oxide (Er2O3) and manganese oxide (Mn2O3)
balance the pale blue/green hue. By
adding ZnO to the batch and melting with a neutral atmosphere, the hue can be
varied from dark amber (0.5% ZnO), to honey amber (0.75% ZnO), to a light hue of
blue/green (1.5% ZnO). By adding 2.0%
ZnO by weight and 2.0% Er2O3 by weight, brown glass can
be color balanced to produce a nearly colorless glass. From this base, other colors can be produced
with some of the common oxide colorants, such as cobalt, manganese, titanium,
and copper.
Green Bottle
Cullet
Green bottle glass gets its
color from small amounts of Cr2O3 dissolved in the
glass. The green color of green bottle cullet is principally
due to the chromium ion Cr 3+.
A 0.05% of Mn2O3 melt yields a neutral hued glass
-- that is, the transmittance spectra of the glass is spread out, minimizing
predominant spikes in the transmittance curves. With this formulation, the Cr3+ ion is color balanced
by the reduction-oxidation equilibrium with Mn 3+ ion. Although the
glass is neutral, it has a gray smoky hue to it. Chrome has two primary valence states, Cr3+ and Cr6+,
with the Cr3+ state yielding the characteristic emerald (bottle)
green. By oxidizing the melt, shifting
the chrome redox equilibrium toward Cr6+, the hue of the glass can
be shifted from the intense green to a yellow/green. If a green or blue glass is desired, decolorization may be
unnecessary, as the green color of the cullet may be utilized or diluted by
combining it with clear glass before colorants are added.
Dark colored glasses can
also be produced using green glass without adding manganese oxide. The density
of the transparent colors made with green cullet result from the additive
properties of coloring ions in solution.
The glass is not decolorized but masked with complementary coloring ions
in sufficient quantities to overpower the chrome yielding dense transparent
colors.
Opal Glasses
Both the client and the
advisory committee expressed a great deal of interest in creating opal glasses,
which generally have higher market values.
Fluorine-based opal glasses can be produced using either clear, green,
or brown cullet.
Opals may be produced by one
of two different methods. The two methods of producing a fluorine-opal glass
have extremely different melting and heat treating requirements.
The first method involves
adding a phosphoric acid and fluorspar mix.
This mix requires very high melt temperatures and high working
temperatures, and produces relatively translucent opals. This mix, however, is also highly corrosive
to crucibles.
The other method of
producing fluorine-based opals is with a high fluorine-content salt called PAF (Al3K6F9). PAF is a by-product of the aluminum refining
process and contains 30% potassium oxide, 20% alumina, and 49% fluorine. PAF melts fluxed with borax require very low melting
temperatures and low working temperatures.
Further, PAF melts do not attack refractories as aggressively as do the
phosphate-fluorine opals. PAF melts are extremely volatile, however, making it
necessary to use an excess of fluorine and to melt and fine the batch as
quickly as possible.
From an opal base, many
different opal colors can be readily produced.
With both clear cullet and green cullet, coloring oxides can be added to
the opal bases to produce corresponding opal colors. The oxides that have a tendency to reduce easily need to be
stabilized in the melt or they will be reduced.
Fluorine-based opal glasses
create a white backdrop for the coloring oxides, making darker colors easier to
see. (Similar colors produced without
opalizers may appear black.) In the
absence of additional coloring oxides, the chrome already present in the green cullet
yields an opal green colored opal glass when opacifying agents are added.
Procedures for melting and
heat-treating opal glasses vary widely, and must be fine-tuned for each
individual facility.
Important Safety Note:
The volatilization of fluorine is a serious health hazard. It is important to keep water out of the batch materials. Water increases the tendency of fluorine to
volatilize. Adequate ventilation must
be provided when fluorine is used.
Fluorine becomes volatile during the melting process. Fluorine is also corrosive to the furnace
refractories, frosts the windows in the studio, and is harmful to the lungs.
Experimental
Procedure
The prototype melts were
designed to simulate the melt conditions at the client’s facility. This included procedures for beneficiating
the base recycled glass, sourcing glass-maker chemicals, controlling melting
conditions, press-forming the final product and annealing the samples. Further, a flexible melt sequence was
required to accommodate daily results/failures. Each aspect of the process was fully
documented.
The glass was obtained from
Rabanco at their Seattle plant. Three
types of glass (clear, green, and brown) are collected through their curbside
recycling program. The glass is
presorted into the truck at the curb.
The glass was crushed with a
hand-crusher to obtain a cullet sizing of two-inch-minus and washed to remove
gross contamination. Ceramics, metals, lead wrappers, and some plastic were
also removed. All paper, foils, and
other colored glasses were left in the cullet.
The debris was weighed to determine the percentage of material that was
removed. This was generally less than
one percent by weight for all the glass received.
This cullet worked fine for
transparent glasses. Repeated trials
revealed, however, that two-inch-minus cullet was too coarse for the opal
glasses, for reasons that will be disucussed below. To produce quality opal colors, the cullet should be pulverized
to at least a 150 mesh size.
Batch Chemicals
The majority of the
chemicals were sourced from local suppliers, such as the local pottery supply
house in Seattle. The chemicals added
to the base glasses in the test melts consisted of fluxing agents, coloring
agents, and opacifiers.
Fluxing Agents
Several different fluxes
were used to facilitate melting the base glasses, including borax, potash, (K2CO3)
and tin dioxide (SnO2), which acts to keep the colorant in
solution. Silicon carbide was added as
a batch reducer.
Colorants
Colorants were added to the
batch to either color balance and/or colorize the base glasses. Copper was added as copper carbonate. Cobalt was added as cobalt carbonate, sodium
as sodium nitrate, and zinc as zinc oxide.
Manganese was introduced as manganese dioxide. The rare-earth ion Nd3+ was introduced as 96% purity
neodymium oxide, Nd2O3.
Cerium was added as cerium oxide, and titanium as titanium dioxide, TiO2.
Opacifying Agents
Two sets of opacifying
agents were used during the laboratory melts to obtain opal colors, as
described above. The first used
phosphorus and fluorine, added as phosphoric acid, H3PO4,
and calcium fluoride, CaF2 (fluorspar). The second used PAF. In
one instance, bone ash was introduced for phosphorous content, replacing
phosphoric acid.
Melting Procedure
Each melt day, four separate batches of 25 to 30 pounds each were weighed out and mixed thoroughly. Each batch was charged into separate crucibles in an experimental test furnace that contained four free-standing crucibles, each with a capacity of 30 pounds. The charge cycle was varied according to the glasses being melted. Generally, each crucible was charged regularly at four intervals, with the last two charges being the smallest. The melt temperature was then allowed to increase slowly for one to two hours to complete the melt. Finally the furnace setting was turned down to allow the glass to slowly cool to the working temperature required the following day. Melting and working temperatures are shown in Figures 1 through 5.
Sample Forming
Samples of each glass
formulation were pressed in a hand-press using a patterned four-inch square
tile mold. This stage of the process is
critical in that this is the stage at which all the working characteristics of
the glass determined.
The glass melt was initially gathered in a gob from which a thread was pulled. From the thread pull, an initial read on the viscosity was taken and the temperature was adjusted as required. Once the melt temperature was satisfactory, the tiles were pressed. Thread samples were also pulled to determine the annealing temperature of each formula melt. Set times were short, as desired for pressing molds, between five and ten seconds. The sample tiles pressed each day were annealled through a cooling down cycle of eight hours.
Color Contamination
Cross-contamination was a major
concern during the melt progressions.
Since the project could not afford a new crucible for every formula, the
melts were organized to minimize prior
melt contamination. Formulas were
sequenced in crucibles that utilized similar colorants and base glasses. For instance, the pot used to melt copper
colored opals was initially used to melt transparent colors. Once a sequence ran its course, the crucible
was exchanged for a new one. To keep
track of contamination, the melt progressions were fully documented with each
melt listing the crucible number and prior melt formula number.
Color
Modification Formulas
Thirteen target colors were
chosen as the most promising, given technical and economic considerations, by
the client and review panel, and a total of 45 separate formula melts were
conducted during the course of this study in an effort to generate these
colors. The colors were specified as
follows:
Target Colors for Green Cullet:
· translucent grape purple
· translucent amethyst
· translucent blue/pink
dichromatic
· opal mint green
· opal purple
· opal cobalt blue
· opal turquoise
Target Colors for Brown Cullet:
· translucent honey amber
· translucent bright red
Target Colors for Clear Cullet:
· translucent amethyst
· translucent swimpool blue
· dichroic blue/pink
· translucent yellow-green
· translucent honey amber
· opal white
Clear
bottle cullet is chemically modified by container manufacturers every day to produce transparent colors. The primary goal of this project was to
validate techniques to recolorize green and brown bottle cullet. During the course of this study, only seven or eight of these colors were
successfully attained (three of which used clear cullet as a base glass),
although it may be possible to attain the remaining colors with minor
modifications to the formulas described in this protocol.
The significant trial melts
are listed in Tables 1 through 5. The
tables are organized according to the type of base glass used. Transparent colors are listed in the first
three tables with each table representing a different base color; the last two
are the opal glass formulas, which use clear and green bottle cullet,
respectively, as base glasses.
The formula number is given
for each melt listed, as is the sample
number which is composed of the melt day followed by the formula number. Melt temperatures and work temperatures used
for each melt are also included in each table.
The chemical additions are given in percent by weight. Base glass percentages are also given by
weight.
The color listed at the
bottom of each column is the actual color of the sample obtained from the
melt. By convention, when describing a
transparent glass, ‘light’ refers to a lightly colored glass, easily seen with
a minimum of lighting. ‘Dense’ is used
to refer to a transparent color that is discernible when light is directed through the glass, but
appears to be black against a white background. If a color is listed without a qualifier, the color is in between
light and dense. In the case of a
transparent glass yielding an opaque sample, a phosphate has been used and the
melt was not complete.
Green-Based Transparent Glasses
From mixed-green bottle
cullet, a series of colors, grape purple, amethyst, steel blue, smoke gray and
black, were produced using different proportions of manganese dioxide and
cobalt carbonate as colorants with various proportions of green and clear
bottle cullet. A sufficient amount of
the Mn3+ ion is used to balance the Cr3+ ion, or
decolorize the glass. Table 1 lists the
melts based on this class of colorization with green bottle cullet.
With the first formulation
(sample #17-1/1), a black appearing glass was obtained. When held up to a bright light, a beautiful
grape purple can be seen. The successive melts attempted to lighten the color
intensity. The next two melts in this
sequence cut the colorants to 25-percent and 50-percent of the colorants used
in formula 17-1 yielding a dense smoke green and a dense smoke gray,
respectively. From these results, it became obvious that the melt was favoring
the Mn2+ state which is a weak brown as opposed to the Mn3+
state which is a deep purple. To favor
the Mn3+ state, sodium nitrate was introduced in the remaining melts
at a ratio of 1.2 times the weight of manganese dioxide pushing the melt into
an oxidation state favoring Mn3+ formation. To further lighten the color intensity,
formulas 17-5 through 17-7 used a 25/75 mix of green and clear cullet,
respectively. By adjusting the
colorant proportions, three different transparent colors were obtained; grape
purple, amethyst and steel blue. To obtain a light amethyst, the green glass
was eliminated and all clear cullet used as shown in formula 17-8.
Brown-Based Transparent Glasses
Using mixed-brown bottle
cullet, a honey amber was developed in two ways. By diluting brown cullet with clear according to formula 5-4, a
less intense amber is produced. With
melt formula 5-3, the S-Fe ligand is completely eliminated with 1.5-percent
zinc oxide yielding a light transparent blue/green. By decreasing the percent zinc oxide to 3/4-percent, a nice honey
amber is obtained that is very near to the same color as obtained with formula
5-4.
Another set of chemical
color modifications were attempted with brown cullet. A dense bright red was attempted by shifting the emission spectra
with copper carbonate and phosphoric acid.
This produced a copper ruby based color when the S-Fe ligand was
eliminated (decolorizing the brown glass) with three percent zinc oxide. The
phosphoric acid/copper carbonate combination in formulas 15-1 and 16-1 were
difficult to completely melt. With the next melt of formula 15-2, the melt
temperature was increased to 2500oF. Still a complete melt could not be obtained; an opaque, grainy
glass was the result from these melts.
A complete melt was reached when raising the melt temperature to 2600oF. However, this high temperature and darkness
of the melt, makes this approach economically unfeasible.
The next trial, formula 15-3
was formulated without phosphoric acid, relying on residual contamination from
the prior melt and adding silicon carbide as a batch reducer.
With this melt, a partially struck (opal) copper ruby was obtained. For the last trial, formula 15-4 was melted
with an increase in copper carbonate and silicon carbide with the addition of bone ash for a source of P2O5
oxide. The resultant color was a very
dense copper ruby or black.
Additional research is
necessary to identify a formula that will successfully yield a bright red
colored glass.
Clear-Based Transparent Glasses
Several melts were conducted
from a base of clear cullet. These melt formulas are listed below in Table
3.
The first formula listed,
formula 1-1, used copper carbonate to
obtain a successful swimpool blue. Formula 3-1 was a 50/50 mix of green and clear
cullet with neodymium yielding a bluish/green glass. The green cullet appears to darken or over-power the effects of
neodymium.
The next three formula
melts, formulas 4-1, 5-1, and 5-2 use titanium dioxide and cerium oxide to
develop a series of colors from light yellow/green to honey amber. Formula 4-1 yielded a light yellow/green
glass that was quite seedy. The glass
seediness is attributable to the 2.5 percent cerium oxide (a foaming
agent). With an increase of titanium
dioxide in formula melt 5-1, a very light amber was obtained. By increasing the melt temperature in melt
5-2, a nice transparent yellow-green color was obtained.
Opal Glasses
The client and market
advisors expressed a high level of interest in glasses capable of reflecting
distinctive colors. Thus, an extensive
portion of the study examined the fluorine based (opaque) glass
modifications. Initially, the formulas
developed earlier for transparent glasses were used as baseline formulas for
the opal glasses. The two methods of introducing
fluorine into these formulas were then tested and formulations were adjusted to
obtain the desired colors.
Clear-Based Opal White Glasses
The client expressed a strong interest in obtaining an opal white. Based on a separate series of test trials, it was determined that a white could not be obtained, within the scope of this project, from brown or green cullet. Therefore, a white opal was formulated using clear bottle cullet as a base glass. These clear based melts are listed below in Table 4.
Two methods of introducing
fluorine into the glass were examined.
In melt 13b-1, two opacifying agents, phosphorus as phosphoric acid (H3PO4)
and fluorine as fluorspar (CaF2), were used. The effects of the
phosphoric acid were similar to those that we had seen during earlier attempts
to produce a red transparent glass.
Again we had a formula utilizing phosphoric acid that required a melting
temperature of 2600oF. A
stiff, grainy glass was obtained with a normal 2400oF melt
temperature and a 2100oF to 2250oF working
temperature. When using a high melt
temperature and work temperature, this class of modification yielded a
consistent opal. An opal white was
obtained with clear cullet; an opal green was made using green cullet.
To decrease the costs associated
with high melting and working temperatures, attempts were also made to develop
a white opal using PAF, a complex opacifying agent. Formula melts 13a-1 through 13a-5 were conducted with varying
percentages of PAF and melting conditions.
At normal melt temperatures,
melt 13a-1, formulated with ten percent PAF, yielded a clear glass sample. In melt 13a-2, the PAF was increased to
twelve percent and zinc oxide was added to stabilize the fluorine. Initially, a clear glass sample was obtained
from the press. The anneal cycle of the
sample was adjusted to check for strike occurring upon heat treatment. The soak temperature was incrementally
increased and held for two hours at each increment. At 1000oF with a two hour soak, the samples began to
strike, turning a translucent white.
To increase the degree of
opalization, the PAF was increased to 18-percent in melt 13a-3. An inconsistent glass was obtained. During sample forming, the glass at the top
of the crucible was extremely loose in workability, and yielded a very dense
opal sample similar to an enamel white glass.
The glass near the bottom of the crucible was very stiff. These samples yielded a clear glass with swirls
of opal white. This formulation
appeared to have a high tendency to separate with the fluorine concentrating at
the top of the crucible. Also, the samples made with this high
fluorine content glass were very incompatible and unstable. The samples inherently pull apart in layers
following the fluorine striae.
During the melts, it was noted that an extreme amount of discharge from the furnace exhaust was occurring during the PAF melts. To decrease the amount of fluorine being burned off, the melt temperature was lowered in melt 13a-4 and the PAF was backed off to 15-percent. Further, in this melt only, a finely crushed (flour) window glass was used for the base clear glass. This was done to see if the cullet size has any affect on the melt conditions. A lower melt temperature was used yielding a consistent, good working light opal green (whitish mint green).
The final formulation for
opal white was melt 13a-5 using 13-percent PAF and melt temperature of 2250oF. Again we used clear cullet of 2-inch minus
simulating the procedures of the client.
This melt yielded an inconsistent glass body with fluorine-rich
swirls. Again there was a high degree
of vapor discharge from the melt and the samples were inherently incompatible.
Green-Based Opal Glasses
PAF melts with various
coloring agents such as copper carbonate, chromium, and cobalt carbonate were
conducted using green bottle cullet as the base glass. The approach was similar to the approach
used to produce the clear-based opals.
Green-based copper PAF
formula samples 8-1/4, 8-2/5 and 8-3/6 (not shown in tables) were melted at the
same time as the opal whites, melts 13a-1/4, 13a-2/5 and 13a-3/6 described
previously. Melt 8-1/4 with ten percent
PAF and no zinc oxide yielded a dense transparent green, no fluorine strike, similar to the clear in
melt 13a-1/4. The next melt, melt
8-2/5, was twelve percent PAF and 1.5-percent zinc oxide, and exhibited a heavy
reduced copper (Cu0) state and a white fluorine swirl. As with white melt 13a-3/6, melt 8-3/6 was
formulated with 18-percent PAF and 1.5-percent zinc oxide, using the
two-inch-minus cullet. Again, the
green-based copper PAF performed similar to the white sample, exhibiting
extreme separation with the top of the batch being extremely rich in fluorine
and the bottom being the color of the base glass.
For the last three days of
PAF melts (days seven, eight and nine),
attempts were made to obtain other consistent opal colors. The
same approach used for the green-based transparent colors was used to obtain
green-based opal colors. Blue and
purple were obtained with cobalt
and manganese,
respectively. A turquoise was produced
in melt 78-1/9 with copper and cobalt.
With formula #10 run each of
the last three PAF melt days, the green cullet’s chromium, Cr3+ state, was used as an inherent colorant
to obtain an opal mint green. With melt
10-1/7, a PAF content of 15-percent was melted at normal temperature (2400oF).
The next melt 10-1/8, the PAF content was kept constant and the melt
temperature lowered to 2250oF.
The final melt 10-2/9 had 13-percent PAF and melted again at 2250oF. As with the melts of the opal white, all
three of these melts showed a tendency to separate. At the top of each melt, fluorine-rich striae samples were
obtained. As the glass samples came
from a lower level in the crucible, less dense striae of fluorine appeared in a
dense transparent green base.
In all of the trials in this
category, the fluorine exhibited a tendency to separate in the melt, producing
inconsistently colored tiles with streaks and swirls. It was concluded, therefore, that a finely pulverized base glass
is critical to obtaining a consistent (well blended) melt.
Conclusion
Pre-sorted post-consumer
bottle glass can be readily re-melted and chemically modified to produce a wide
variety of colors. Test trials demonstrated that brown cullet can be
decolorized to a nearly colorless, neutral hue, and then recolorized into
transparent colors. Green cullet was
color balanced using manganese, and then recolorized into other relatively
dense transparent colors. Further
research is required to obtain lighter green-cullet based transparent colors.
The results of this study
suggest that it is also possible to generate a wide range of opal colors from
green, brown, or clear cullet. Each
color formula must be developed on site, however, to make adjustments for
workability, color concentration, color hue, melt redox equilibrium, melting environment and raw material
sourcing. Strict control over the melting, forming and annealing processes is
also required, whether using phosphate-fluorine opacifiers or the
alumina-fluorine opacifiers. Minimizing melt times will help to reduce
fluorine volitilization.
For the various green-based
colored opals and the clear-based white opals, the fluorine was difficult to
blend, and separated in the melt, using two-inch-minus cullet. Several attempts were made to improve the
melt conditions and arrive at appropriate PAF concentrations. The best results were obtained using a 150
to 200 mesh pulverized glass sand and a shortened melt time. If these adjustments are made, a whole set
of opal colors can be obtained from recycled glass
The transparent glass
formulas produced relatively consistent and satisfactory results. Successful formulas were developed for
producing grape purple, amethyst, honey amber, swimpool blue, and yellow-green
colors. The only transparent color that
was not successfully attained was bright red.
Further trials with brown
cullet could yield better results by adding additional agents to neutralize the
brown cullet.
Acknowledgments
The support of this project
by Randal Dalbey gratefully acknowledged.
The technical assistance of Lance Brittain and Fritz Driesbach through
the whole project, as well as their perspectives and extensive experience with
glass chemistry and glass making, was of immeasurable value.
Ro Purser (Langley, WA)
provided a prototype press to press the formula melts. Initial test melts and
spectral analyses were conducted by Don McPherson of Bay Glass Research,
Berkeley, CA. The prototype melts were conducted
at the Randal Dalbey’s glass products development facility in Seattle, WA.
|
Table 1:
Formulas for Green-Based Transparent Glasses |
|
Formula # |
17-1 |
17-3 |
17-4 |
17-5 |
17-6 |
17-7 |
17-8 |
|
Objective Color |
Grape Purple |
Grape Purple |
Grape Purple |
Grape Purple |
Grape Purple |
Amethyst |
Amethyst |
|
State |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
|
Melt Temp |
2400°F |
2400°F |
2450°F |
2400°F |
2420°F |
2420°F |
2450°F |
|
Work Temp |
2250°F |
2090°F |
2070°F |
2180°F |
2120°F |
2190°F |
2070°F |
|
Melt Atmosphere |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
|
Clear cullet |
|
|
|
60.5% |
63.8% |
63.8% |
85.5% |
|
Green cullet |
80.3% |
81.0% |
80.8% |
20.2% |
21.3% |
21.3% |
|
|
Borax (10mole) |
16.4% |
16.4% |
16.4% |
16.4% |
8.2% |
8.2% |
8.2% |
|
Zinc Oxide |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
|
Potash |
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
|
Manganese Dioxide |
1.1% |
0.275% |
0.55% |
0.55% |
0.275% |
0.385% |
0.275% |
|
Cerium Oxide |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
|
Cobalt Carbonate |
0.032% |
0.008% |
0.016% |
0.032% |
0.022% |
0.016% |
|
|
Sodium Nitrate |
|
|
|
0.66% |
0.33% |
0.462% |
0.33% |
|
Sample No. |
17-1 /1 |
17-3 /3 |
17-4 /4 |
17-5 /5 |
17-6 /6 |
17-7 /7 |
17-8 /11 |
|
Sample Color Results |
Black to Dense Purple[2] |
Dense Smoky Green |
Dense Smoky Gray[3] |
Dense Grape Purple |
Steel Blue |
Dense Amethyst |
Amethyst |
|
Translucent |
semi |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
|
Table 2: Formulas for Brown-Based Transparent Glasses |
|
Formula # |
5-3 |
5-4 |
5-5 |
15-1 |
16-1 |
15-2 |
15-3 |
15-4 |
|
Objective Color |
Honey Amber |
Honey Amber |
Honey Amber |
Bright Red |
Fuschia Red |
Bright Red |
Bright Red |
Bright Red |
|
State |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
Transp. |
|
Melt Temp |
2450°F |
2350°F |
2350°F |
2400°F |
2500°F |
2500°F |
2450°F |
2350°F |
|
Work Temp |
2070°F |
2250°F |
2250°F |
2200°F |
2280°F |
2280°F |
2070°F |
2250°F |
|
Melt Atmosphere |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Neutral |
|
Clear cullet |
23.9% |
48.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brown cullet |
71.7% |
48.5% |
96.3% |
84.9% |
84.9% |
84.9% |
90% |
90% |
|
Borax (10 mole) |
5.5% |
8.2% |
8.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zinc Oxide |
1.5% |
|
0.75% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
|
Potash |
|
|
|
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
|
Tin Dioxide |
|
|
|
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
|
Copper Carbonate |
|
|
|
0.14% |
0.07% |
0.14% |
0.14% |
0.35% |
|
Cobalt Carbonate |
|
|
|
|
0.08% |
|
|
|
|
Silicon Carbide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04rw% |
0.11rw% |
|
Phosphoric Acid (75%) |
|
|
|
9.2% |
9.2% |
9.2% |
prior melt residual |
|
|
Bone Ash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25rw% |
|
Sample No. |
5-3 /11 |
5-4 /12 |
5-5 /12 |
15-1 /3 |
16-1 /10[4] |
15-2 /10 |
15-3 /11 |
5-3 /11 |
|
Sample Color Results |
Light Green |
Honey Amber |
Honey Amber |
Opaque Blood Red |
Opaque Copper Blue (very grainy) |
Opaque Blood Red (swirly) |
Transparent blue/green w/ some Cu Ruby strike |
Very Dense Cu
Ruby (Black) |
|
Translucent |
yes |
yes |
yes |
no |
no |
no |
yes |
no |
|
Table 3: Formulas for Clear-Based Transparent Glasses |
|
Formula # |
1-1 |
3-1 |
4-1 |
5-1 |
5-2 |
|
Objective Color |
Swimpool Blue |
Dichroic Blue/Pink |
Yellow Green |
Honey Amber |
Yellow Green |
|
State |
Transparent |
Transparent |
Transparent |
Transparent |
Transparent |
|
Melt Temp |
2400°F |
2500°F |
2400°F |
2450°F |
2500°F |
|
Work Temp |
2250°F |
2280°F |
2250°F |
2070°F |
2280°F |
|
Melt Atmosphere |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
|
Clear cullet |
79.8% |
37.8% |
80.3% |
71.4% |
71.4% |
|
Green cullet |
|
37.8% |
|
|
|
|
Borax (10mole) |
16.0% |
27.4% |
16.4% |
6.85% |
6.85% |
|
Zinc Oxide |
5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Potash |
8.8% |
|
8.8% |
22.1% |
22.1% |
|
Cerium Oxide |
|
|
2.5% |
2.5% |
2.5% |
|
Copper Carbonate |
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
Neodymium |
|
10% |
|
|
|
|
Titanium Dioxide |
|
|
2.5% |
7.5% |
7.5% |
|
Sample No. |
1-1 /1 |
3-1 /10 |
4-1 /3 |
5a-1 /4 |
5-2 /10 |
|
Sample Color Results |
Swimpool Blue[5] |
Light Green to Blue-Green[6] |
Light Yellow to Yellow-Green |
Light Amber to Clear |
Light Yellow to Yellow-Green |
|
Translucent |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
|
Table 4: Formulas for Clear-Based Opal White Glasses |
|
Formula # |
13b-1 |
13a-1 |
13a-2 |
13a-3 |
13a-4 |
13a-5 |
|
Objective Color |
Opal White |
White |
White |
White |
White |
White |
|
State |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
|
Melt Temp |
2400°F |
2450°F |
2400°F |
2420°F |
2250°F |
2250°F |
|
Work Temp |
2250°F |
2070°F |
2100°F |
2120°F |
1940°F |
1950°F |
|
Melt Atmosphere |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
|
Clear cullet |
84.2% |
85.7% |
83.6% |
77.6% |
78%* |
82.6% |
|
Borax (10mole) |
8.2% |
8.2% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
|
Zinc Oxide |
|
|
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
|
Fluorspar |
8.85% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phosphoric Acid (75%) |
7.36% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAF (Al3K6F9) |
|
10% |
12% |
18% |
15% |
13% |
|
Sample No. |
13b-1 /1 |
13a-1 /4 |
13a-2 /5 |
13a-3 /6 |
13a-4 /8 |
13a-5 /9 |
|
Sample Color Results |
Grainy White (opal at 2600°F) |
Clear (no strike) |
Translucent Opal White |
Opal White (separation) |
Light Opal Green[7] |
Light Opal White (separation) |
|
Opaque |
|
|
no |
yes |
yes |
yes |
|
Table 5:
Formulas for Green-Based Opal Glasses |
|
Formula # |
10-1 |
10-1 |
10-2 |
12-1 |
12-2 |
12-3 |
7-2 |
78-1 |
|
|
Objective Color |
Mint Green |
Mint Green |
Mint Green |
Purple |
Purple |
Purple |
Cobalt Blue |
Turquoise Blue |
|
State |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
Opal |
|
|
Melt Temp |
2420°F |
2250°F |
2250°F |
2420°F |
2250°F |
2250°F |
2250°F |
2250°F |
|
|
Work Temp |
2190°F |
1900°F |
1950°F |
2190°F |
1900°F |
1950°F |
1900°F |
1950°F |
|
|
Melt Atmosphere |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
Oxidation |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
Oxidation |
Neutral |
|
|
Clear cullet |
|
|
|
|
|
60.6% |
|
|
|
|
Green cullet |
80.6% |
80.6% |
82.6% |
80.6% |
81.3% |
20.2% |
78.8% |
83.1% |
|
|
Borax (10mole) |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
|
|
Zinc Oxide |
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
|
|
Manganese Dioxide |
|
|
|
1.1% |
0.385% |
0.385% |
|
|
|
|
Copper Carbonate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7% |
|
|
Cobalt Carbonate |
|
|
|
0.08% |
0.016% |
0.016% |
0.16% |
|
|
|
Sodium Nitrate |
|
|
|
|
|
0.42% |
|
|
|
|
PAF (Al3K6F9) |
15% |
15% |
13% |
15% |
15% |
13% |
14% |
12% |
|
|
Sample No. |
10-1 /7 |
10-1 /8 |
10-2 /9 |
12-1 /7 |
12-2 /8 |
12-3 /9 |
7-2 /8 |
78-1 /9 |
|
|
Sample Color Results |
Opaline Green[8] (separation) |
Mint Green (separation) |
Opaline Green (separation) |
Dense Blue (separation) |
Pinkish Brown |
Mauve (separation) |
Cobalt Blue (swirly) |
Turquoise[9] w/ some white swirls |
|
|
Opaque |
yes |
|
yes |
|
|
|
yes |
no |
|
[1] For the purpose of this protocol, low-value is considered to be less than $20 per ton aggregate markets, intermediate value is considered to be $20-60 per ton, the approximate range of the value of collected recycled glass to container manufacturers, and high-value is considered to be greater than $60 per ton.
[2] The tile produced was very similar in both color and translucency to Spectrum® medium purple Cathedral color #146W.
[3] The smoky gray tile produced was slightly more yellowish in hue but similar in intensity to Spectrum® pale gray Cathedral color #180.8W.
[4] The opaque copper blue tile produced (#16-1) was less translucent but similar in color to Spectrum® dark blue Cathedral color #136s.
[5] The tile produced was very similar in both color and intensity to Spectrum® medium blue Cathedral color #533-1s.
[6] The tile produced was not opaque but similar in color to Spectrum® medium green color #823-72s.
[7] The tile produced was similar in both color and intensity to Spectrum® green #325-2s.
[8] The tile produced was very similar in both color and translucency to Spectrum® green Cathedral color #329-1s.
[9] The cobalt blue tile (#7-2) was denser but similar in color to Spectrum® blended medium blue color #533-1W.