![]() |
Post-Consumer Contaier Glass
Remelting Process Assessment |
|
|
FINAL REPORT
Clean Washington Center
A division of the
Pacific NorthWest Economic Region (PNWER)
2200 Alaskan Way, Suite
460
Seattle, WA 98121
Norman Courtney
Copyright © 1997 CLEAN WASHINGTON CENTER. All rights reserved. Federal copyright laws prohibit reproduction, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of the Clean Washington Center. To write or call for permission: CWC, 2200 Alaskan Way, Suite 460, Seattle, Washington 98121, (206) 443-7746.
CWC
disclaims all warranties to this report, including mechanics, data contained
within and all other aspects, whether expressed or implied, without limitation
on warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose,
functionality, data integrity, or accuracy of results.This report was designed
for a wide range of commercial, industrial and institutional facilities and a
range of complexity and levels of data input.
Carefully review the results of this report prior to using them as the
basis for decisions or investments.
LINKS
This report contains links to outside resources and documents that are
pertinent to the context of the information in this report. The following list will take you to the
point in the report where you can use each link:
CWC (formerly the Clean Washington Center)
The Pacific Northwest Economic Region (PNWER)
Andela Tool and Machine, a manufacturer of glass
processing equipment
Glass Aggegate Manufacturing and Engineering, a
manufacturer of glass processing equipment
A CWC report on modifying the color of
recycled glass
A CWC report on recycled glass chemical composition
The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Helath (NIOSH)
chemical data sheets
Spruce Pine, a manufacturer of glass batch
materials
TriVitro Corp., a glass processor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0... BACKGROUND...................................................................................................... 1
1.1... ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS................................................................. 1
1.2... HOW TO USE THIS PROTOCOL................................................................. 2
1.3... FREEHAND GLASS FORMING PROCESSES......................................... 2
1.4... GLASS CASTING PROCESSES................................................................. 3
2.0
GETTING STARTED
USING POST-CONSUMER
RECYCLED GLASS................................................................................................ 4
2.1... SOURCING...................................................................................................... 4
2.2... CULLET PREPARATION............................................................................... 5
2.3... BATCH CHEMICAL ADDITIONS.................................................................. 7
2.4... MELTING.......................................................................................................... 9
2.5... COLOR COMPATIBILITY TESTS............................................................... 11
2.6... ANNEALING.................................................................................................. 12
3.0... DATA FROM THREE PILOT STUDIES........................................................... 12
3.1... OLIVE GLASS COMPANY.......................................................................... 12
Sourcing and Cullet Preparation................................................................. 13
Melting............................................................................................................ 13
3.2... ANDIAMO GLASS COMPANY................................................................... 15
Sourcing and Cullet Preparation................................................................. 15
Melting............................................................................................................ 16
3.3... AVALON GLASS COMPANY..................................................................... 18
Melting............................................................................................................ 19
4.0... CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................
21
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Chemicals for Glass
Appendix B: Cullet Formula
Appendix C: Fritz’s Annealing Temperature Test
1.0 BACKGROUND
The cast and pressed glass product
manufacturing industry has been identified by the Clean
Washington Center as a potential high-value market for recycled glass.
Recycled glass generally requires less energy to process and costs less than
batch materials typically used in glassmaking shops. In addition, test trials have shown that, in many cases, by
carefully controlling batch formulas and melting procedures, recycled content
products can be manufactured with physical and aesthetic qualities similar to
those of products made with virgin materials.
From
a cost standpoint, recycled glass may appear to be an attractive feedstock for
hot shop operations. However, some
glass artists believe that these savings may be small compared to the risks
associated with using recycled glass.
This is because the raw material cost usually represents only a small
fraction of the final price of the product.
Glass art objects may sell for anywhere from $10 to $200 per pound of
glass. By comparison, the primary
supplier of premixed batch to the Northwest art glass community sells glass
pellets for about $0.35 per pound. Thus
the savings in raw materials alone are insignificant in high end applications,
especially hand blown products.
Recycled glass may be most promising as a substitute feedstock in
production casting or pressing operations, where the material represents a
larger percentage of the final price.
In
addition, crystal clear products require a clarity of glass that can never
be obtained with post-consumer bottle glass.
Colored or iridescent products, however, can be
manufactured using post-consumer glass without diminishing the aesthetic
integrity of the piece. The ultimate viability of recycled glass as a feedstock
is product driven.
Topics
covered in this protocol include:
¨ Sourcing
¨ Cullet Preparation
¨ Batch
Chemical Additions
¨ Melting
¨ Color Compatibility Tests
¨ Annealing
¨ Data From Three Pilot Studies
1.2 How to Use this Protocol
This protocol can be used as a tool for
establishing effective and repeatable methods for incorporating post-consumer
glass into the melting practices of small glassmaking studios. Reliable, economically efficient, and energy-saving
practices in sourcing, processing, and melting recycled post-consumer glass
are specified
to assure predictable good quality glass. The information
contained in this protocol should help interested
shops make the appropriate conversions to successfully use recycled glass
to
replace
some, or all, virgin feedstock (raw batch chemicals) or post-industrial cullet,
with post-consumer recycled glass cullet.
Recommendations
contained in this protocol apply only to recycled soda-lime bottle glass. In general, viscosity requirements of the high-rate
production processing press and blow machines used worldwide in the container
industry dictate that the chemical composition of container glasses more or
less conform to universal standards. Mixing
a variety of container glasses for re-melting does not pose any insurmountable
barriers to achieving a homogeneous end product, provided that there is no
major contamination by inorganic materials or glasses of radically different
compositions.
Because
glass products vary widely from one studio to the next, the processes described
herein take into account various end product requirements.
1.3
Freehand Glass Forming Processes
Glass has been utilized as a decorative
and functional material for nearly four thousand years. Almost all of the
studio glass shops in Washington State manufacture glass by the traditional
hand-forming method. In this method,
molten glass is gathered on the end of hollow stainless steel blowpipes or
solid steel rods. Cup-shaped wet wooden
blocks, steel marveling tables, specialized hand tools,
and the breath of the craftsperson are
then used
to shape molten glass
into a variety of products.
1.4
Glass
Casting Processes
Glass studio-scale shops which produce cast glass products generally
use
mild steel ladles to scoop small amounts of molten glass
from the furnace. The ladle is then
used to pour the fluid glass into an open mold cavity in sand, carbon block or
metal.
2.0
Getting Started Using
Post-Consumer Recycled Glass
Obtaining a quality glass for blowing or
casting from post-consumer bottle glass hinges on four major processes: sourcing, cullet preparation, addition of
batch chemicals, and melting. In order
to obtain a glass with good working characteristics and very little striae
(cords), it is important that the guidelines described herein be followed. Always know the health implications of
batching chemicals. For information
related to the safety of specific chemicals listed here, see the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health.
2.1 Sourcing
Connecting with a reliable source of
post-consumer recycled glass is the first critical step. First and foremost, the cullet must be clean
(i.e. free of dirt, rocks, metals, other glasses like Pyrex7
or automobile head lamps, and ceramics).
Unfortunately, coffee mugs, glass cookware and broken dishes are
commonly found in many recycling bins.
Forging partnerships with community recycling centers, local
restaurants, company cafeterias, large scale container plants (such as the
Foster Ball Glass Container Corporation in Seattle, WA, or Owens Brockway in
Portland, OR) or similar heavy users of glass containers can be an important step in obtaining a clean
and consistent recycled glass feedstock.
Drop box sites are one of the easiest places
to start. If a clean clear feedstock
is desired, it will be necessary to verify that proper
quality control measures are implemented
at the material’s source. Good drop box sites most often have on-site
personnel with higher standards for sorting and contaminant removal than unmanned
sites.
A good relationship with drop box site
staff will allow you to educate them about your shop’s own special needs. Presenting samples of ceramic stones and
cords in the glass is an effective way to convince suppliers that even small
amounts of contamination can cause big problems for the small studio
glassmaker.
A busy local restaurant or cafeteria can
provide a large stable supply of glass containers from a single beverage
brand. A labeled receptacle to collect
the glass containers makes it easy for cafeteria staff or patrons to supply
your shop with clean single-source cullet.
2.2 Cullet Preparation
Preparing the cullet for melting consists
of cleaning the cullet, removing any remaining debris, and crushing it to an
appropriate size, if necessary.
In all circumstances, it is a worthwhile
practice to pour the glass out onto a screen or flat surface in order to wash
it and search
for
contaminants prior to using it in a melt.
If any debris or dirt is present, it will need to be removed.
Some paper in the batch is acceptable.
Excessive amounts of paper (i.e. other than the remaining bottle labels)
should be removed, however, as the ash generated during the melt can cause
contamination problems.
When
it is possible to obtain all recycled
glass from
the
same large scale container plant, processing
to like-sized particles is not critically important. The same is usually true when using similar types of containers. What
is more likely is that recycled glass is obtained from a variety of sources. In this case, it is best to crush the glass
to a like size, ideally less than 1/4 inch, to insure uniform melting.
It is recommended that, whenever possible,
the glass be crushed to between 1/16 and 3/4 inches, especially if large quantities
of chemicals are to be added to the batch. The amount of crushing necessary to prepare
recycled glass depends to
some extent on
the product being made. In small scale hand blowing and casting shops,
however, it is usually best to crush the glass to a size that allows it to melt
with the addition of the oxidizers, fluxes, and fining agents described
in the next section and listed in the attached appendices.
These chemicals do not combine well with cullet larger than 3/4 inch,
which generally take longer to melt and can result in bubbles, chunks of chemicals,
striae, or cords in the final product. In
addition, forcing air bubbles up through the bottom of the tank or pot using
a compressed air line hooked up to a blowpipe may help.
For mold blown and cast glass objects,
which require little or no fluxing, less size reduction may be acceptable,
especially if color compatibility is not important (see Color Compatibility Testing,
below). Some container crushing is
still recommended, though, to minimize the violent impacts against the furnace
side-walls due to the thermal shock explosions occurring at the moment the
cullet is charged into the
furnace. These large particle
explosions are particularly detrimental to free standing pots or crucibles.
Regardless of the application, it is
important to sift or wash the smallest powder-sized particles (called “fines”) out of the feedstock. Grains under 1/16 inch tend to trap small
air bubbles in the batch, and make the batch more difficult to melt, increasing
the need for fluxing and fining agents (usually noxious or toxic
chemicals). Very fine glass powder also
increases the residency time for floating out bubbles from the melt. Water washing the crushed glass on a common
#16 mesh window screen easily solves this problem. The water also helps to reduce dusting when handling the cullet.
Currently there are no operating
commercial suppliers crushing glass to the specifications or cleanliness needed
by small glassmaking shops in Washington State, although the newly forming Trivitro Corporation
(Kent, WA) sells beneficiated post-industrial and post-consumer glass. Alternatively, bench scale glass crushers
that can produce finely and uniformly ground cullet are available from several
companies. Prices for these crushers
start at $5,000. A bottle breaker can
be purchased for less than $2,000, although this type of equipment cannot
produce the finely ground glass that studios generally require.
Further information on small-scale glass
to fines processors may be obtained by contacting the following manufacturers.[1]
·
Andela
Tool & Machine, Richfield Springs, NY
Cindy Andela, 315‑858‑0055
·
Glass
Aggregate Manufacturing & Engineering (G.A.M.E.),
Faribault, MN
Don Cook, 507‑334‑6437
2.3
Batch Chemical Additions
It is a common practice in large glass
factories to add glass cullet to raw batch materials in order to promote rapid
melting of the batch, and thus save on energy costs. Large container manufacturing plants often purchase post-consumer
recycled glass from curbside collection companies in order to reintroduce this
glass into their melts.[2]
The fact that most bottle glasses are of similar composition makes the practice
of adding post-consumer glass to standard batch melts possible, and highly
effective, for small studios as well.
However, glass for the high production
container industry is formulated to set up quickly and hold its shape when
mechanically blown into molds. Glass
melts for freehand blown objects and certain complicated fabricated products,
on the other hand, need a long working range.
Multiple re-heatings during the freehand process further drive off the
dissolved gases and the volatile alkalis in the glass, raising the viscosity
and shortening the working range.
Casting
Applications. Additional chemicals are added to
recycled glass for three primary reasons:
(1) to insure compatibility with common colorbars,
(2) to increase the working range of the remelted glass, and
(3) to facilitate the melting and blending of
recycled glasses from various sources.
If the remelted glass is intended to be
cast or mold blown, trial melts have shown that the batch additions listed
below can produce a glass with a relatively quick set time and a linear
expansion coefficient (LEC) that matches that of German colorbars. To each 100 pounds of glass, the following
chemicals were mixed and added:
2 lbs. soda ash
33 g. borax
175 g. niter
150 g. fluorspar
1/2 lb. lithium carbonate
50 g. antimony oxide
25 g. manganese dioxide
For certain cast products, where color
compatibility is not an issue and a longer working range is unnecessary, it may
be possible to either cut these amounts in half or eliminate them altogether.
The formula above was developed at Avalon
Glass Company (Seattle, WA) using a very clean, clear bottle cullet, crushed to
a relatively consistent size (1/16” to 1/4”).[3] It is important to note that there are many
variables that influence the physical characteristics of the remelted
glass. Different shop conditions and
base glasses will result in remelted glasses with different physical characteristics.
Each individual studio is encouraged to experiment with this formula, making
changes as necessary to arrive at the chemical proportions that will work best
with its own individual processes and applications.
Reasons for including the recommended
additions are listed in Appendix A - Chemicals for Glass.
Freehand
Glass Forming Applications. To obtain the working range required for
freehand processes, additional fluxing agents are added to the batch (soda ash
being the most common). It is
recommended that the total soda ash content remain below 18% (by weight),
otherwise the glass will lose its durability and become susceptible to
corrosion by moisture. Bottle glass
already contains between 13% to 16% soda ash.
About 2% is generally expected to volatilize during the melting
process. Since bottle glass is
formulated to set quickly, additional fluxing agents will probably be required
to achieve the desired working characteristics, especially if the glass is to
be hand blown. Due to the limited scope of this project and the economic considerations
discussed earlier, trials were not performed to arrive at an optimal batch
recipe for hand blown products.
Decolorizing
Agents. Chemicals are available to decolorize glass
by breaking down the sulfur-iron ligands and balancing the chromium ions present
in brown and green glasses. A small
amount (one tablespoon) of powder blue (a frit made from cobalt blue glass)
may be used to modify the green hue of the clear bottle glass. For a more complete technical discussion of
decolorization methods, refer to Color Modification of Post-Consumer Glass Cullet
Clean Washington Center publication #GL-96-4.
Soda-lime-silica glass chemistry and hand-forming techniques have been essentially the same
for 2,000 years. The primary changes
in the glass industries during that time have been improved-efficiency combustion
technology and longer-life refractory materials.
Because the quantities of ware produced
in small-scale glass studios are relatively small, glass is most often melted
in ceramic crucibles or small refractory-brick lined day tanks; usually at the
highest temperature that the walls, roof, and pot or crucible can endure.
At melting temperatures of 2350 to 2600
degrees Fahrenheit, the viscosity of the glass is lowered to a point that
allows the bubbles to rise readily through the melt. The raw materials interact chemically during the melting process
and thereby alter much of their individual composition. The gases given off in bubbles during the
decomposition of some of the raw materials serve a useful purpose by agitating
the melt and making it more homogeneous.
At these temperatures, however, the rate
at which the furnace is attacked and dissolved by the corrosive elements in
the glass is accelerated. At a temperature
of 2,600 degrees Fahrenheit, it has been shown that a medium scale glass factory
is capable of melting 7 tons of glass in a 13 hour melt cycle.
[4]
This requires that
furnaces be made with AZS (Alumina-Zirconia-Silica) liners and super-duty
silica brick crowns. These dense refractories
are able to resist dissolution for 15-18 months of continuous operation. The
type of feedstock being melted also has an enormous effect on the life of
a furnace. Raw batch chemicals and
the high heat required to melt the virgin materials are the most harmful (corrosive),
while straight cullet and lower temperatures are actually the least damaging.
Straight cullet requires about 10% less energy to melt.
Some shops are loath to try recycled
glass for fear of contaminating their furnaces. However, the switch to more expensive virgin chemical batch or
post-industrial cullet feedstocks, for those products deemed to require it, can
be made by flushing the furnace with a small melt.
During the trial melts, the furnace was
charged at regular intervals for three hours at about 2350 degrees
Fahrenheit. The glass was then allowed
to melt at the same temperature for another four hours, and finally left to
idle for several hours. The final step
of rapid cooling is called squeezing.
Squeezing appears to effectively eliminate the large free oxygen and gas
bubbles present at higher temperatures.
The furnace temperature is then slowly raised back to the working
temperature. This melt cycle is capable
of producing a very clean glass, free of fines and small bubbles.
The crucible in a pot furnace can either
be invested in other refractory material or freestanding, and heated with
natural gas, propane, or electric elements as energy sources. The most energy efficient furnace for a small shop is the multi-phase electric
freestanding pot furnace with solid-state rectifier power controls. The freestanding crucible is also more
fragile, however, so care must be taken to use the correct melting procedures,
cullet gradations, and batch recipes.
An invested furnace is less energy efficient, but can withstand more
abuse.
The linear expansion coefficient of the
new glass should be tested to evaluate whether it is compatible with German
colorbars (if color is to be added).
Due to melting temperature variations, each studio should do its own
testing. The pull test is a quick method of evaluating color compatibility. Equal amounts of color and clear glass from
the furnace are placed side by side, heated together, and pulled into a long
thin thread. As soon as the thread sets
up it is placed on the floor and broken into 12 - 18 inch lengths. The two glasses will bend toward the glass
with the higher linear expansion
coefficient (LEC). If when placed
against a straight edge, the curvature displacement in the thread is less than
1/4 inch over one foot of length then the glass is said to ‘fit,’ and the glasses
may be used together. If the curvature
displacement is greater than one inch then the glasses will probably break
apart at some point in time, even months or years later. This is to be avoided as it can be
expensive, not to mention embarrassing.
Although commonly used, keep in mind that
this pull test is a quick and dirty non-scientific glass shop practice. The more accepted method for determining LEC
compatibility is to blow two thin cylinders, one with the glass color on the
outside and the other with the glass color on the inside. Cut narrow rings
out of each cylinder and score with a glass cutter and break along the score. If the higher expansion (LEC) is on the outside
the ring will pull away from the score, and if on the inside the ring will
close. No apparent pulling in either
direction should indicate similar LEC’s which are “compatible.” Since it is necessary
to wait until the pieces are annealed to perform
this test,
most shops do not do it, but this test most closely approximates the real
product performance.
2.6 Annealing
After a glass article is formed, it must
be annealed to remove the internal stresses that were created during the
forming process. This is done by
“soaking” the formed glass in an annealing oven at a pre-determined
temperature. This temperature depends
on both the thickness and geometry of the product. One way to determine the annealing temperature is to pull a rod
out of the tank glass, approximately 1/4-inch in diameter and 18 inches in
length. One end is then captured between two firebricks and cantilevered out
into the oven. The temperature is
slowly brought up until the rod begins to bend. (Appendix C provides
instructions for finding the annealing temperature.)
For example, Tooley[5]
gives recommended annealing schedules for soda lime glasses of various
thickness. The annealing temperatures
given by Tooley range from 1020 °F for 1/4” plate glass to 934 °F for 11/4” plate
glass. The time that the glass must
spend at the annealing temperature is highly dependent on the thickness of the
glass, ranging from 5.5 minutes for 1/4” glass, to a
little over two hours for 11/4” glass. This initial soak is followed by a
controlled cooling cycle of a similar duration.
The following three trial melts provide
tangible evidence that conversion to recycled feedstock is economically
beneficial and technically feasible for some shops.
The processing and test information for
these trial melts were used to develop recommended batch formulas and melting
procedures contained in this protocol.
Since testing re-melted cullet for compatibility with decorative glass
colors is essential to successfully changing feedstocks, some discussion of
this subject is also included. The
trials are presented here in the order in which they were conducted.
3.1 Olive Glass Company
Olive Glass Studios (Lopez Island, WA) is
a typical example of a rurally located studio dependent on bottled gas fuel
(propane) and a clever, low-technology manually-operated system. The local drop box recycling staff was eager
to participate in finding high value-added products for their glass. Drop box glass is normally
trucked off the island at great expense for beneficiation and use elsewhere
(e.g., as construction aggregate).
Sourcing
and Cullet Preparation. Special barrels were set aside at the
drop box site to collect glass from similar products, in this case juice
beverage containers. Two different
mixtures of cullet were collected, so that two different trials could be
conducted. As it turned out, 95% of the
containers in the first mixture were Snapple beverage bottles. The assumption was that thin-walled bottles
would be very nearly the same formula regardless of the particular industrial
factory source. The second mixture was
comprised of mixed bottles (not all Snapple brand), some with thick walls. The paper labels were patiently removed by
hand from the first mixture, while no paper labels were removed from the
bottles in the second mixture. Both
mixtures were crushed in a barrel with a steel bar just enough to break them
down to three-inch to 1/2-inch sized pieces.
This cullet was then rinsed off with water.
Melting. The
Olive Glass Studio furnace is a 230-pound. invested Laclede-Christy crucible
that is propane gas side-fired with a Giberson burner head from just above
the crucible level. The burner port
is hand drilled and there is no pyrometer to indicate accurate temperature
readings.
At Olive Glass, chemicals were mixed in
the following proportions:
¨ 25 pounds Soda Ash
¨ 7 pounds Borax (penta)
¨ 2 pounds Sodium Nitrate
¨ 1 lb. Fluorspar
¨ 100 g. Antimony Oxide
¨ 150 g. Manganese Dioxide
One hundred pounds of the cullet were
then mixed with six pounds of this chemical mixture. The feedstock mixture was charged into the furnace at a rate of
approximately 30-pounds every 40 minutes, for a total charging time of 4
hours. Each charge was allowed to melt
down flat before adding the next. After the last charge the glass was left
on high fire, approximately 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit, for 4 hours. Batch stones and un-melted conglomerations of chemicals were present in all the
periodic samplings dripped onto the steel marver. An additional two hours was added to the high fire cycle. After this extended melting time, the
furnace was idled at approximately 1,900 degrees Fahrenheit for eight
hours. More samples continued to show
poor glass quality and the decision was made to reduce the amount of chemicals
in the next test.
The second test used the same handling and
charging procedures as the first test, but reduced the ratio of added chemicals
to three pounds per 100 pounds of rough crushed
cullet. High fire was kept to four
hours total and periodic punty gather samples showed the glass to be fairly
well melted with very few fines and some large bubbles after only two hours. At the end of the normal high fire, the glass
looked very clean and free of large and small bubbles. The glass idled for nine hours before use the
following day.
Color compatibility (pull) tests were performed
with the glass produced in the second melt and numerous German colorbars (Kuglar7, Reichenbach7,
and Zimmerman7). All
the transparent German colors tried “fit” the clear glass in this test.
The opaques
fit with the exception of the red-yellow color being slightly off, as is often
typical, due to the decrease in expansion (LEC) caused by the replacement
of lead by zinc in cadmium and selenium colors.
Zinc-oxide modified glasses are also less forgiving of LEC mismatches
than lead-oxide modified glasses.
The normal Olive Glass Studio production
items were made in order to compare them with products normally made in the shop. Decorative
bead tubing, mold blown vases, beer steins, roundels, Christmas ornaments,
and cast boat deck lights were made to test handling characteristics of the
glass.
The recycled glass was a little stiffer
than the West Virginia pressed-ware post-industrial cullet normally used by
Olive Glass Company. But as a result of
matching the colorbars, it worked fine for all of the applications listed
above. This glass seems ideal for mold
blown pieces, castings, and Christmas ornaments, where Olive Glass Studio wants
the glass to set up quickly. Complex
shapes that have thick and thin wall sections are more difficult with this
particular recycled cullet melt. More
work needed to be done on optimizing the chemical additions for other various
working characteristics.
Two
major lessons were learned from this pair of test melts:
(1)
the mixed glasses from different initial
types of cullet were, for the most part, compatible; and
(2)
three pounds of fluxing agents were adequate
to gain good melting and working characteristics, while excessive chemical
additions and large cullet sizes resulted in a
poor quality
glass.
3.2
Andiamo Glass Company
This Redmond, Washington based company was
chosen as a test site for two reasons. First,
Andiamo uses natural gas fuel from a gas utility company and the furnace there
has a high-tech combustion system with controllers.
Second, there was also an opportunity to use feedstock that was crushed
and screened to a uniform size by a nearby suburban community drop-box collection
operator.
Sourcing
and Cullet Preparation. Glass used for this test was obtained
from the Mercer Island Community Recycling Center. Color sorting is faithfully carried out by the participants and a
high level of contaminant removal and color separation is maintained by an
enthusiastic on-site staff.
The cullet is produced by crushing whole
bottles in a small hammermill. The size
distribution is achieved by sifting the fine particles through a common window
screen. The facility uniformly crushes
and then sorts to minus 1/4 inch plus 1/16 inch particle size.
The clear glass used for the test
consisted of a variety of domestic food containers and beverage bottles, and
some imported beverage bottles. The
crushed glass was very clean, though a small number of aluminum neck rings and
about a half cup of shredded paper labels per 100 pounds of glass were present.
The crushed cullet was poured onto a
galvanized metal table where the aluminum was patiently picked out and a fan
was directed over the material to remove some of the paper labels. The paper was not thought to be a problem,
although a large amount of metal foil labels could cause problems in the
melt. The sheet metal table was wetted
first so that when the glass was poured off some fines stuck to the wet metal
surface.
Melting. Fluxing
and fining chemicals were combined in the following proportions:
¨ 4 pounds Soda Ash
¨ 600 g. Borax (Penta)
¨ 350 g. Niter
¨ 300 g. Fluorspar
¨ 1 lb. Lithium Carbonate
¨ 100 g. Antimony Oxide
¨ 50 g. Manganese Dioxide
¨ 0.2 g. Cobalt Carbonate
Three pounds of the above mixture was
combined per 100 pounds of cullet by hand using a large flour scoop.
The Andiamo Studio furnace is heated with
natural gas and forced air by a side-mounted Eclipse MVTA burner. It has a 130-pound capacity, round bottom
Laclede-Christy invested crucible. The
furnace was preheated to 2,300 degrees
Fahrenheit and charged with 36 pounds on the first charge, and allowed to melt
for 45 minutes. Four more charges were
then made with 30 pounds in each charge, 30 minutes apart. The furnace was left on the high fire
setting of 2,350 degrees for four hours.
The temperature controls were then set at 1,900 degrees and over the
next nine hours the glass was left to idle until ready for use the next
morning.
Samples of the glass taken two hours into
the melt revealed mostly large bubbles, some fines, a little striae, and no
batch stones. After four hours there
were no cords or large gas bubbles and very few fines. Glass was slightly blue due to the addition of
cobalt carbonate. This amount can
be reduced to 0.1 gram or replaced with powder blue, a frit made from
cobalt blue glass. Pull tests were
performed with the German colorbars from Kugler, Zimmerman, and Reichenbach,
all of which pulled slightly toward the clear glass. The degree to which the colors in the strands bent toward the clear
was very nearly the same as that in subsequent tests with the Spruce Pine
Company7 virgin chemical batch feedstock (which
the Avalon Glass Company uses regularly).
These pull tests indicate that the clear recycled glass cullet should
fit the various colorbars, but due to melting temperature variations, each
studio should do its own testing.
A variety of pieces were made that were
similar to regular production work. Some
new pieces were also made in order to test the glass’ temperature working range
and handling characteristics. The
recycled glass was also tested for a new line of products by casting it into
prototype sand molds. It worked very
well in this application.
The recycled glass stayed hot and more
malleable longer than the glass
Andiamo was normally melting for production (West Virginia post-industrial art
glass at $600 FOB Seattle). Upon
re-heating, it seemed difficult to get one area hot for tooling without the
whole piece becoming more malleable all at once. The recycled glass set up more quickly but could still be shaped
and tooled without making tool marks.
For casting, the recycled glass flowed well into complicated forms and
easily healed over at the end of the pour.
While it seemed more difficult to work
with the recycled glass for thin and complicated shapes that required
considerable hand tooling, it was fine for thicker simple shapes. More experience with this glass would probably
diminish this problem. The glass would
probably be ideal for mold blown work because of its tendency to set-up
quickly. This property also proved to
be a great benefit when casting into metal and sand molds where it is important
that the glass hold its shape and not deform (slump) during transfer into the
annealing oven.
Annealing temperature was determined by
pulling a rod out of the tank glass to approximately 1/4-inch in diameter and
cutting it to 12-inches in length. One
end was then captured between two firebricks and cantilevered out into the
oven. The temperature was slowly
brought up until the rod began to bend. At that point, the temperature was
reduced 50 degrees and held at that temperature. (See Appendix C) The
annealing schedule was determined to be:
¨ One hour soak at 920 degrees (see
Appendix C - Annealing Temperature)
¨ 1/2 hour down to 810 degrees
¨ 1/2 hour down to 710 degrees
¨ 1/2 hour down to 610 degrees
¨ then, power-off
Due to their long term experience with
glassblowing and significant understanding of glass chemistry, Andiamo Glass
Studio was an excellent test site.
Indeed, the more experienced glass workers seemed more amenable to
trying post-consumer glass as a feedstock, possibly due to their appreciation
that all commercial scale container glasses share more similarities than
differences.
3.3 Avalon Glass Company
This West Seattle (WA) shop was selected
because their glass is melted in an electrically heated freestanding crucible
furnace. This furnace might be ideal
for melting the minus 1/4-inch to plus 1/16-inch cullet available from the
Mercer Island Community Recycling Center.
Melting. The
furnace is powered by a silicon-controlled rectifier dimmer switch and eight
Glowbar elements manufactured by IR2 Company7 of New York. It has a 150-pound Lecleod-Christy7 crucible free-standing pot which
requires 70-80 amps. on high fire, and 30 amps at idle temperature. An Omega7 controlling pyrometer is used to
carefully regulate furnace temperature.
Furnace electricity is not metered separately, but the total for monthly
electric bills,
including annealing ovens and lights, is between $200 and $250. The furnace was designed and constructed by
Greg Englesby and Jim Moore of Seattle.
The post-consumer glass used for this test
was also sourced from the Mercer Island drop box site. The glass was not
screened or washed for this test. Chemical
additions were combined in the following proportions:
¨ 2 pounds Soda Ash
¨ 33 g. Borax (Penta)
¨ 175 g. Niter
¨ 150 g. Fluorspar
¨ 1/2 lb. Lithium Carbonate
¨ 50 g. Antimony Oxide
¨ 25 g. Manganese Dioxide
This mixture was combined with 100 pounds
of cullet using a large flour scoop that was also used to charge the furnace.
The furnace was preheated to 2,350
degrees Fahrenheit and charged with six scoops at approximately six pounds per
scoop. The first charge was 36 pounds
and melted for 60 minutes. The second
charge was 30 pounds and allowed to melt for 120 minutes, followed by the third
charge of 30 pounds and left on high fire for four hours. The furnace temperature was then reduced to
2,100 degrees for three hours. The
furnace temperature is then slowly raised back to the working temperature, in
this case 2,150 degrees.
The recycled glass melted faster and
“fined out” much more quickly than the Spruce Pine virgin chemical batch
formula that Avalon normally uses. Due
to the small particle size of the cullet, there were no popping or small
explosions as is often seen when using cullet of a much larger size. Preventing this sort of abuse of the
furnace’s side walls is critical for lengthening the life of any furnace,
particularly a free-standing crucible furnace.
Fining time could probably be reduced for
this formula. The chemical agents
worked well to stir the various glasses together to obtain one homogeneous
glass. There were some cords observed
near the bottom of the pot, but these could easily have been a result of
residual glass from previous melts.
Pull tests were conducted as described in Appendix C. The threads for both transparent and opaque colors pulled straight,
indicating an acceptable fit with the clear glass. The annealing temperature was determined to
be 915 degrees Fahrenheit (see Appendix C Annealing Temperature).
The products usually made by Avalon
Studio were produced with the post-consumer glass. The recycled content cullet melt lacked the clarity of the Spruce Pine
Company glass, but was appropriate for all products where color was
introduced. Working characteristics
were also different in that the temperature working range was shorter, allowing
the glass to set up quickly. This
characteristic is desirable, however, for one of the major products made by
Avalon - Christmas ornaments. It is
likely that hand tool work would be easier given more time to become familiar
with the glass’s character.
The ease of melting, the local sourcing,
and particularly the cost advantage of $100-$150 per ton (as opposed to $775
per ton for virgin chemical batch or $600 per ton for West Virginia
post-industrial glass, both FOB Seattle) makes melting post-consumer feedstock
a very attractive opportunity. One of
the Avalon associates has recently purchased another building and is planning
to expand into a line of cast glass products.
The post-consumer glass is well suited in all ways for cast glass
production objects.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
The three trials above constitute an
evolution of experimental batch recipes and procedures, the latter of which
were the most successful. The best
results were attained during the third trial, conducted at Avalon Glass. The melt time was reduced during this trial
without compromising the quality of the remelted glass. No popping occurred in the crucible during
the melt, and the final product was free of stones and cords.
The working range of the glass produced
at Avalon was relatively short, which allowed the glass to set up quickly -- a
desirable characteristic for some cast and mold blown products. It is important to note, however, that there
are many variables that influence the physical characteristics of remelted
glass. Different melt conditions and base
glasses will result in remelted glasses with different physical characteristics.
The trials described above have shown
that it is possible to produce recycled glass ware with physical and aesthetic
qualities similar to those of products made with virgin materials. Depending on the application, the use of
recycled glass can also dramatically reduce energy and raw material costs.
Appendix A - Chemicals for Glass
Note: For
all chemicals read the MSDS*
information carefully!
Sodium carbonate or soda ash, Na2 CO3, is employed to provide alkali
to the batch. Soda is a flux which by
definition makes the glass melt faster.
It also provides a longer working range, decreases the viscosity at all
temperatures, increases the thermal expansion, decreases the chemical
durability. Experimentally, an addition
of 25% of soda ash to silica lowers the melting point from 3110 degrees
Fahrenheit to 1460. In practice sodium
should not exceed 18% of the batch or the durability may be lowered to a point
that the glass is readily attacked by atmospheric water. It is important to keep soda ash in a dry
storage space because it readily absorbs moisture and carbon dioxide, changing
it to sodium bicarbonate. As a
consequence, this additional weight can change the glass formula. More problematic still is that the moisture
creates lumps in the soda that may difficult to melt out.
Boric oxide, B2O3, is introduced into glass formulas most commonly in the form
of sodium tetraborate pentahydrate,
Na2B4O7 5H2O, or 5 mole borax. Borax is used in its granular or powdered
form and also supplies sodium as Na2O.
Borax facilitates melting and fining to such a degree as to lower the
melting temperature. It lowers the LEC
significantly, shortens the working range, lowers the viscosity, and improves
surface quality.
Sodium nitrate, NaNO3, also called niter, has the lowest melting point of most of
the glassmaking materials. In addition
to accelerating the melting of batch, niter is more importantly used as an
oxidizing agent. Oxidizing agents work
to keep the iron in glass in an oxide state which is yellow-green and easier to
mask with decolorizers than the reduced form of iron which is blue-green.
Calcium carbonate or lime, CaCO, is a powerful flux that reacts
with silica at lower temperatures, gives glass stability, reduces the working
range, and increases its resistance to chemical attack. If present in the glass at greater than 10%,
lime may increase the possibility of devitrification (crystallization of
glass).
Potassium oxide, K2O, is usually introduced into the batch as potassium nitrate also
called potash, K2CO3, which like soda, adds alkali. Potassium is a good fining agent and flux, and best when used in
conjunction with sodium. Potash glasses
are more viscous than soda glasses and colors are brighter, and in some cases
even different (e.g. nickel is blue-purple in potash and brown in soda;
selenium appears bluish pink in soda and brownish pink in potash).
Antimony oxide, Sb2O3, is similar to arsenious oxide and is used for the same
purpose - to assist in the elimination of bubbles from the molten glass and to
control the color of iron. Like
arsenic, it is also very poisonous, and because the pentoxide decomposes more
easily, is in some cases a more effective fining agent. It is the fining agent of choice because it
works at lower temperatures and is used in conjunction with niter for maximum
oxidizing effect. The oxidizing of iron
- moving it from ferrous to the ferric state (i.e. making it yellow-green
instead of blue-green) - is probably the most effective way to decolorize
post-consumer glass. Antimony erases
the inconsistent and difficult to control manganese. Selenium is now the preferred agent for decolorizing.
Lithium carbonate, Li2CO3, is a very active flux for silica , accelerates melting and
fining, and is very effective in getting everything into solution.*
Fluorspar, or calcium fluoride, CaF2, provides beneficial fluxing
action and makes the glass less viscous, which allows more stirring and bubble
action.
Manganese dioxide, MnO2, was used as the only decolorizer in clear glass for hundreds
of years, long before the chemistry was
understood. Iron is always
present as an impurity in raw materials for glass, and as a result of abrasion
during beneficiation and transportation.
Manganese is employed as an oxidizer to hold iron in the ferric state
and as a physical decolorizer that absorbs light very nearly complementary to
that of iron, especially in conjunction with a trace of cobalt oxide. It is, however, inconsistent and difficult
to control and rarely used in industry any longer. Antimony virtually erases its effect, giving the glass a gray
color and making selenium the element most commonly used as a decolorant.
Cobalt oxide, CoO, is an extremely powerful coloring agent in glass, as little as
one part in 500,000 will yield a tint of blue and one part in 5,000 is
sufficiently intense for most ware.
Because it is so strong, the oxide is used as a decolorant in some
dilute form, such as powder blue,
where it exists as a frit of glass containing between 4% and 6% cobalt
depending on the supplier.
Selenium oxide, SeO, is the preferred decolorant for container glasses. The pink
color of selenium partially complements the green color of iron and is an
effective decolorizer when the oxidizers arsenic or antimony are present. Iron
is thereby held to the yellow end of the spectrum and the glass is further
physically decolorized at that point by the addition of a trace of cobalt.
Appendix B - Cullet Formula
A large commercial glass container
manufacturer cites the following percentages as the compositions of their large
stockpiles of post-consumer cullet feedstocks for their furnaces.*
Oxides percent
SiO2 72.3
Al2O3 2.0
Fe2O3 0.1
CaO 10.4
MgO 0.6
BaO 0.05
NaO 13.3
sum = 98.75
other
oxides are not used in their calculations.
Appendix C -
Fritz’s Annealing Temperature Test
HOW TO DETERMINE THE CORRECT ANNEALING TEMPERATURE (“AT”) OF YOUR GLASS;
IN YOUR OVEN; IN YOUR STUDIO
Remember, each oven may have a different
temperature for ideal annealing!!!
{{ Do not use anyone else’s annealing
point numbers for your ovens! }}
My definition of the correct AT is: “that temperature which, in one (1) hour,
does not bend a 1/4 inch rod, @ 18-inches long, standing diagonally (approx. 45
degrees) against the floor and wall of the oven being tested; but at that same temperature, does bend the same rod in four (4) hours.”
You can run this test WHILE you are
loading an oven; I periodically run a test while making my thick blown glass
pieces. The canes can be out of the
way, near the wall. If you want to test
a new setting, remember to put in a new
cane AFTER the oven is stabilized on the new setting ! Also one can
substitute for the rod a strip of sheet glass 1/8” by 1/2” by @ 15” long.)
1. To start the testing first pull some straight rods & cut them
approx. 18” long. Stabilize the oven in question at a temperature you believe
will anneal your glass. Put the cold rod into the hot, stabilized oven!! The starting temperature doesn’t matter,
just give it a number. You can use 980 degrees Fahrenheit if you wish. Remember
to be sure the temperature is stable at the suspected annealing temperature b
e f o r e you put the test in the oven.
2. The best annealing temperature will result in the cane (or strip)
remaining straight after one (1) hour, but bending after four (4) hours (at
that same temperature!)
3. If the cane is bent in one
hour or less, then the temperature too hot !! So lower the annealing
temperature set point @ 10 degrees or more) and stabilize at the new
temperature before you put in a new cane.
4. If the cane is still straight after four hours, your suspected
annealing temperature set point is too low (you are too cold!) So raise the set
point about 25 degrees or more. Then after the oven temperature is
stable, put in a new cane and start a new test.
5. Eventually you can “zero” in on the correct temperature as you continue to test both higher and lower set points. Very thin glass can probably be annealed at a lower “a.t.” setting if a long soak time is required (which might otherwise slump the thin units).
Reprinted by
permission of Fritz Dreisbach
[1] This is not intended to be a complete list of manufacturers. Others can be found in the Thomas Register.
[2] Opinions vary as to what the maximum useful quantity should be, but the usual proportions are from 15% to 50% by weight of cullet in the industrial furnace feedstock. Appendix B gives the formula which Owens-Brockway Container Company7, Portland, OR considers to be representative of their clear cullet pile of post-consumer glass. Owens-Brockway then adjusts their other chemical additions to put dissolved gases and alkali volatiles back into the glass as the cullet melts.
[3] See discussion of trial melt beginning on page 9, conducted at Avalon Glass Company.
[4] This estimate is based on data obtained from Spectrum Glass Company, Woodinville, Washington.
[5] Tooley, Dr. Fay V. The Handbook of Glass Manufacture, 3rd Edition, Volume II, Ashlee Publishing, 1984.
* Material Safety Data Sheet
* According to Kerry Longaker, the production manager for the Glass Eye, with lithium added to the melt, “you can rule the world.”
* Reference: phone report on 2-7-96