1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND GOALS.........................................................................
1.1 Project Background And Objectives.......................................................................................
1.2 Compost End-Use Guideline Objectives.................................................................................
1.3 Project Overview...................................................................................................................
2.0 GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS......................................................................
5 2.1 Guideline Development Steps..................................................................................................
2.2 Project Initiation.....................................................................................................................
2.3 Case Study Development........................................................................................................
2.4 Guideline Development And Review.....................................................................................
2.5 Beta
Testing Process.............................................................................................................
3.0 LESSONS LEARNED.......................................................................................................
3.1 Guideline Development Process Assessment.........................................................................
3.1.1 Literature
Review...........................................................................................................
3.1.2 Case
Studies..................................................................................................................
3.1.3 Technical
Review............................................................................................................
3.1.4 Beta
Testing...................................................................................................................
3.2 Beta Testing Results..............................................................................................................
3.2.1 Guideline
1: Soil Amendment for
Planting Beds..............................................................
3.2.2 Guideline
2: Soil Amendment for
Marginal Soils.............................................................
3.2.3 Guideline
3: Blended Topsoil Component......................................................................
3.2.4 Guideline
4 : Garden and Plant Mulch.............................................................................
3.3 Beta
Test Conclusions...........................................................................................................
4.0
ACKKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................
24 5.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................
25 aPPENDICES Appendix A Best
Practice Guidelines Appendix
B Case Study Protocol Appendix C Case
Study Write-ups (Not included in this electronic file but available
upon request) Appendix
D Beta Testing Protocol Appendix
E Beta Testing Write-up
1.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND GOALS
This report describes the
process by which four compost end-use guidelines were developed,
and ultimately makes recommendations for improving this process.
The intended audience for this report is policy makers, researchers,
and other people interested in understanding how the guidelines
were actually developed and how the development process could be
potentially improved. The actual compost use guidelines (presented
in Appendix A) are intended for professional users of compost products. These guidelines are available as a stand alone
document through either the Clean Washington Center or the Composting
Council in Alexandria, Virginia. 1.1 PROJECT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Compost production continues
to grow as communities throughout the country implement new, and
expand current composting programs.
In the Puget Sound area, diversion of yard debris (1), food
wastes (2), animal manures (1) and wastewater treatment solids (3)
to composting programs is continuing to increase.
This diversion could increase annual compost production by
an additional 200,000 to 300,000 cubic yards within the next five
years (1). In order for composting to remain a viable
alternative to organic waste disposal, markets for compost products
must be increased. Market
studies conducted in King County and other locations throughout
the country indicate landscapers are the current largest single
compost market. In most
locations, other markets for compost such as horticulture and turfgrass
production are virtually non-existent. In King County, for example, landscapers use approximately 80 percent
of the compost sold (1). Market studies commonly indicate many potential
end-users do not use compost because they are unsure how to use
the product, what type of product they need for their specific end-use,
a specification does not exist, or they are unfamiliar with the
product. In addition, compost processors are not cognizant
about product needs for some specific end-uses, and as a result
do not produce compost that meets the specific requirements of some
end-users. In recognition of these barriers to developing
markets for compost products, the Composting Council and Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS) sponsored
a project in 1994 to develop best practice guidelines for using
compost products. The project developed best practice guidelines
for the following six end-uses:
·
Horticultural substrate
(growing media) component
·
Soil amendment for silviculture
(reforestation)
·
Soil amendment for turf
establishment
·
Soil amendment for vegetable
crop production
·
Growing media for sod
·
Soil mulch for erosion
control Based on the success of this first compost
end-use guideline development project, the Clean Washington Center's
Recycling Technology Assistance Partnership (ReTAP) provided funds
to develop additional end-use guidelines.
The primary objectives in conducting this project are summarized
as follows.
·
Develop four additional,
new compost use guidelines using the same format as the six previously
developed guidelines.
·
Develop and implement
a protocol for conducting case studies. The objective of the case studies was to document the use of compost
by prominent and experienced professionals to supplement published
research aiding in the development of the end-use guidelines.
·
Develop and implement
a protocol for field or beta testing the guidelines. The purpose of beta testing was to elicit critical
comments on the practical application of the guidelines from professionals
that would use them.
1.2 COMPOST
END-USE GUIDELINE OBJECTIVES
The compost end-use guidelines
are intended to meet the following objectives
·
Provide the end-user
with information regarding appropriate characteristics for the specific
end-use.
·
Provide instructions
on how to use the product.
·
Provide processors with
information on the type of product required for the specific end-use.
·
Provide the basis for
compost specification development.
·
Provide the basis for
future public and professional educational efforts and publications. It is anticipated that these guidelines
will provide a foundation for the expansion of compost product markets
by improving product reliability and enhancing successful product
end-use. The development of compost end-use guidelines
is also an opportunity for the Composting Council to expand its
network of responsible public agencies, scientists, producers and
users involved in compost market development. 1.3 PROJECT
OVERVIEW
The ReTAP project entailed the development
of compost end-use guidelines for the following applications:
·
Blended topsoil component
·
Soil amendment for planting
beds
·
Soil amendment for marginal
soils
·
Garden and plant mulch Published research provided the basis for
developing the compost end-use guidelines.
In addition, the practical experience of selected end-users
was documented (as case studies)
and subsequently used to supplement the published research. The resulting conceptual guideline was reviewed
initially by a Technical Review Committee comprised of academic
researchers and scientists. After incorporating the Technical Review
Committee comments, the draft guidelines were submitted to the Clean
Washington Center, Composting Council Marketing Committee, and a
Regional Review Committee for review.
The Regional Review Committee consisted of professional end-users,
compost producers and marketers, and public agency planners working
in the State of Washington. Meetings were held with the review committees
to discuss the resulting comments.
A third draft of the guidelines was accepted as a final draft. The guideline development process is described
in greater detail in Section 2. A beta testing task was conducted to assess
how useful the guidelines were in a field setting. The beta testing task entailed observing a
professional end-user use compost after they had read the guidelines. The beta testing participant was then asked
a series of questions to determine how useful the guidelines were,
how they might be improved and who might potentially use them. Results are provided in Section 5.2 of this report. The Composting Council is a national trade organization that represents a broad cross section of professionals involved with compost production and marketing, research, planning and other activities relevant to composting. As a sponsor of the guidelines development project, the Composting Council is conducting the following guideline dissemination activities.
·
Press releases and newsletter articles that describe
the end-use guidelines project and the availability of the guidelines.
·
Presentation of the
guidelines at Composting Best Practices Workshops sponsored by ReTAP.
·
Presentation of the
guidelines at the Council’s annual conference.
·
Dissemination of a publications
list (that includes the end-use guidelines) to all people requesting
information from the Council. 2.0
GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
This section of the report provides a description
of how the compost use guidelines were developed. Lessons learned from the project and recommendations
for improving the guideline development process are presented in
Section 3. 2.1 GUIDELINE
DEVELOPMENT STEPS
The following steps were used to develop
compost end-use guidelines. I. Project Initiation
1.
Selection of a Regional Review Committee
2.
Selection of four compost end-use applications
3.
Selection of a Technical Review Committee II. Guideline Development
1.
Conduct literature search
2.
Develop and implement case study protocol
3.
Develop first draft of four guidelines
4.
Review of guidelines by review committees
5.
Incorporate review committee comments
6.
Prepare final draft of four guidelines
III. Guideline Testing
1.
Beta testing protocol development
2.
Beta testing participant selection
3.
Beta testing implementation
4.
Development of recommendations The guideline development process is described
in greater detail as follows. 2.2 PROJECT INITIATION
Prior to actually developing
the compost use guidelines, the framework for conducting the project
needed to be set in place. This
included selecting a Regional Review Committee, a Technical Review
Committee, and the four compost end-use guidelines to be developed.
A Regional Review Committee was assembled
to provide a link between the national Composting Council and local
producers and users, and to ensure the Pacific Northwest region
was represented in the guideline development process.
This committee was also convened to assure regional variations
in compost use (climate, soils, plant species, etc.) were represented
in the compost use guidelines.
The Regional Review Committee was comprised of people who
have a more direct involvement in the day to day production and
use of compost than the Technical Review Committee and the Composting
Council Marketing Committee. In selecting a Regional Review Committee,
a list of people in Washington with experience producing or using
compost was created. The
list was divided into three basic categories: compost producers
and marketers, public agency employees, and professional end-users.
In selecting the committee members, the following criteria
were considered:
·
Approximately equal
representation of all three categories
·
Representation of eastern
Washington (as a note of interest, there is much less composting
taking place in rural eastern Washington than urban/suburban western
Washington)
·
Representation of the
Washington Organic Recycling Council’s Marketing Committee A letter was sent to each potential member
describing the project and soliciting their involvement as a committee
member. A few people declined
the invitation and alternate committee members were solicited. The resulting committee consisted of 14 members,
three of which represented eastern Washington. The committee consisted of five compost producers,
six professional compost users and three public agency employees.
During the project, the committee met a total of three times. An initial Regional Review Committee meeting
was conducted to introduce members to the project and begin the
process of selecting four new compost applications for which compost
use guidelines would be developed.
During the meeting, a list of potential compost uses was
developed and after a lengthy discussion, the committee “voted”
on the end-uses they thought were most appropriate for guideline
development. The committee
was asked to consider the following criteria in selecting the specific
end-uses:
·
Currently a large volume
market or potential for becoming a large market
·
End-use meets public
sector needs
·
End-use is highly visible
·
End-use is environmentally
beneficial The top six end-uses selected by the committee
are presented as follows, in order of the number of votes received:
1.
Blended topsoil component
2.
Soil amendment for marginal soils
3.
Soil amendment for planting beds
4.
Soil amendment for bioswales
5.
Garden and plant mulch
6.
Soil amendment for orchards Previous guidelines developed by the Composting
Council were based on published information that documented how
the compost was used and how well it performed in a specific application. Guidelines developed in this project were also
to be based on published information in order to be consistent with
the earlier compost end-use guidelines.
Therefore, the next step in the guideline development process
was to determine if sufficient published literature existed for
four of the six end-uses selected.
The search utilized the following five primary
resources, 1.) a computer database assembled by the Composting Council,
2.) Agricola, a computer database focusing on agriculture and the
natural sciences, 3.) the Technical Review Committee, 4.) E&A
Environmental Consultant’s existing library and 5.) bibliographies
from technical papers retrieved during the search.
The research publications obtained were reviewed to assess
whether they were relevant to developing the specific guidelines. A bibliography of pertinent research papers was then assembled.
The literature search identified very little
published information regarding the use of compost in orchard fruit
production, and no published information regarding the use of compost
in bioswales. A bioswale
is a grass lined depression used to collect and treat surface water
from an area with an impermeable surface such as a parking lot.
Several surface water control manuals (produced by the Municipality
of Metropolitan Seattle and the King County Surface Water Management
Division) have considerable information about the design, construction
and maintenance of bioswales, but do not contain any information
on the use of compost in the bioswale media.
Due to the lack of available published information regarding
the use of compost in orchard fruit production and bioswale construction,
the development of end-use guidelines for these two compost uses
was not pursued further.*
______________________________________________ *As
a note of interest, a project to define the use of compost in bioswale
construction was funded by the Clean Washington Center’s ReTAP program
in October 1995. The project
entails the design and construction of a bioswale containing compost,
followed by the collection of monitoring data to establish if and
how compost improves bioswale performance.
Information gained from this project
will provide the basis for developing a guideline for using compost
in bioswale construction. After selecting the specific compost applications
for which end-use guidelines would be developed, a Technical Review
Committee was selected. The
purpose of the Technical Review Committee was to ensure that the
guidelines were technically accurate and represented the most current
research regarding the specific end-use.
The Technical Review Committee was comprised of academic
researchers and scientists having experience at a research level
with the specific compost end-use application. The Composting Council Marketing Committee,
the third review committee used in developing the guidelines, provided
a direct link to the Composting Council. This committee also provided continuity between different compost
use guideline development projects, whereas the Regional and Technical
Review Committees are newly constituted for each project. 2.3 CASE
STUDY DEVELOPMENT
This task entailed the documentation of
how prominent and experienced professionals use compost in the specific
applications selected in this project.
The case studies for each specific end-use were then used
to supplement published research in the development
of that guideline. The use of case studies was a new addition
to the guideline development process.
This task was added due to a lack of published research for
many specific compost use applications.
Furthermore, published
research does not typically address some of the important practical
aspects of applying and incorporating compost.
In addition, field applications often encounter poorer soil
conditions than those used in controlled research projects. Another important consideration in using
case studies as a source of technical information for developing
the guidelines was that researchers have a much different perspective
on using compost than professional end-users and producers.
Research studies typically focus on how the use of specific compost products affect the growth of a few specific plant species in a specific application. The resulting information is undoubtedly of
great benefit to the end-user and compost producer. However, users and producers have much broader information needs
that include efficient methods for applying the compost, use of
compost in different soils, use of compost for different plant types,
and maintenance requirements after plant installation.
The narrow focus of research does not allow for the rapid
development of a broad base of technical information.
In contrast, an experienced end-user can provide much broader,
albeit less well documented, information regarding compost use. However, it was also recognized that anecdotal
information based on the qualitative observations of experienced
end-users may not always be accurate.
Consequently, a protocol was developed to provide a standard
procedure for documenting how industry professionals use compost
in specific applications. The
protocol (presented in Appendix B) includes the following five basic
steps.
1.
Review and modify survey format
2.
Develop case study participant selection
criteria
3.
Identify potential case study participants
4.
Select case study participants
5.
Conduct case study interview Throughout the process, the three project
review committees were used as a resource for identifying case study
participants and reviewing the survey format.
In this project, three case studies were developed for each
of the four guidelines. The
resulting 12 case study write-ups are presented in Appendix C. 2.4 GUIDELINE
DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW
Using the published research identified in the literature search and the case study write-ups, a first draft of the four guidelines was developed. In a few cases where published research was limited, per |