Evaluation of Recycled Plastic Feedstocks & Marketing Strategies For A Solar Oven

Report No.  PL-oo-3

 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 

 

CWC is a nonprofit organization providing recycling market development services to both businesses and governments, including tools and technologies to help manufacturers use recycled materials.  This research was partially funded by CWC’s Recycling Technology Assistance Partnership (ReTAP), through a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  

 

The CWC acknowledges the following participants for their contributions to this project:

·        Persons Helping People (PHP) for participating in this project and eagerly working to incorporate recycled plastic into their solar oven products.  PHP is a non profit corporation based in St. Paul, Minnesota.  The mission of PHP is to empower people and build communities through the support of sustainable and replaceable entrepreneurial activities that utilize appropriate technologies.  PHP was established in 1991 using a trust fund donated by Virginia Persons.

 

·        BottomLine Consulting, Inc., (Ohio) provided invaluable expertise and analysis of the viability of the recycled plastics in the product. 

 

·        Spirit West Management provided a market analysis and perspective for the solar oven. 

 

 


 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1

 

I.    RECYCLED PLASTIC MATERIAL EVALUATION.......................................................... 9

1.0     PRODUCT DESIGN OVERVIEW..................................................................................... 9

1.1     Performance Requirements............................................................................................... 9

2.0    SUITABILITY OF POST-CONSUMER PET FOR USE IN SOLAR OVEN    COLLAR, CASING, AND GLAZING............................................................................................................................ 7

2.1     Determination of Process Limitations and Solutions.......................................................... 13

2.2     Formulation Development............................................................................................... 15

2.3     Evaluation of Production Runs......................................................................................... 17

3.0     RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RPET USE IN COLLAR & CASING............................. 18

4.0     RECYCLED HDPE PLASTIC LUMBER IN SOLAR OVEN GLAZING FRAME.......... 19

4.1     Performance and Fabrication Needs............................................................................... 20

4.2     Specifications................................................................................................................. 20

4.3     Performance Requirements and Potential Suppliers.......................................................... 21

4.4     Cost Analysis of an HDPE Plastic Lumber Glazing Frame................................................ 22

5.0     RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RECYCLED HDPE PLASTIC LUMBER IN SOLAR OVEN GLAZING FRAME...................................................................................................................................... 24

 

II.  MARKETING STRATEGY EVALUATION....................................................................... 25

1.0     COMPANY BACKGROUND......................................................................................... 25

2.0     CURRENT DOMESTIC MARKET CONDITIONS........................................................ 25

3.0     CURRENT INTERNATIONAL MARKET CONDITIONS............................................ 20

4.0     ANALYSIS OF PHP MARKETING STRATEGY........................................................... 23

5.0     MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................... 22 


 

 


INTRODUCTION

 

Persons Helping People (PHP) is a non-profit corporation whose underlying mission is to help alleviate hunger in developing countries by helping people help themselves.   

 

Their primary product is a prototype solar cooker oven.  Solar ovens have the potential to reduce the consumption of cooking fuels, such as wood, by 50%, and have the potential for impacting conservation efforts in developing countries.   Over two billion people in developing countries do not have enough fuel to cook their small amounts of rice, corn or beans.  Many families spend as much (or more) on charcoal and firewood as they do on food.  Others spend up to six or seven hours daily gathering firewood, which is scarce, for cooking.  These cooking fires produce irritating smoke.  An alternative to cooking over a fire is to use solar ovens.  These solar ovens do not create pollution and most fuel-poor countries are sun-rich and can benefit from solar cookers.

 

PHP gained considerable experience in the manufacture and distribution of solar ovens that were produced by the Sunstove Corporation in South Africa.  Sunstoves were sold in Nicaragua, Haiti, El Salvador, Mexico, and Honduras.  The experience and expertise gained during this project led PHP to develop a prototype solar oven model, the “SOS Sport.”   The material cost per oven is projected to remain under $20 (U.S.) and each oven could potentially consume the equivalent of sixty-five, 20-ounce, clear polyethylene terepthalate (PET) bottles, one salvaged aluminum printing plate, and several feet of recycled plastic lumber. 

 

Key elements of a quality solar oven are durability, efficiency, attractiveness, and low-cost.  The prototype “SOS Sport” is a low-cost, easily assembled, lightweight, durable, attractive, and efficient solar oven.  Although solar ovens will not totally replace other methods of cooking, they have the potential to reduce the consumption of cooking fuels (such as wood) by 50%.  This reduction in fuel usage is particularly important in developing countries. 

 

The design of PHP's prototype solar oven, includes four potential components that could be manufactured from recycled plastic; an injection molded casing, the collar, a thermoformed acrylic glazing, and the rigid oven frame.  The glazing is bonded to an oriented polyester film to create an insulating air space above the solar oven.   The casing and collar pieces are currently manufactured from polypropylene and nylon resins.  The lid frame is constructed from natural lumber.  Although natural lumber is suitably rigid for this application, it is relatively expensive, generates considerable sawdust during fabrication, has limited weatherability, and is prone to use as firewood in underdeveloped countries.

 

The CWC worked with PHP and two consultants to evaluate the “SOS Sport” solar oven model with respect to:

 

·        Use of recycled PET in the collar and casing of the oven;

·        Use of recycled plastic lumber in the framing of the oven; and

·        Marketing strategies.

 

The estimated maximum temperature inside a solar oven is 300°F, so internal components must withstand exposures to this temperature for extended time periods and service life.  The objectives of this project were to:  (1) verify whether product performance requirements can be met subsequent to substituting post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for the oven collar and casing; (2) evaluate the performance and viability of plastic lumber for the oven frame; and (3) determine appropriate domestic and international marketing strategies for the current solar oven model.

 

PHP retained the services of Bottom Line Consulting, Inc. (BLC), of Lake Barrington, Illinois, to provide technical assistance for evaluating and testing recycled PET plastic for use in the casing and collar of the solar oven, and for evaluating and testing the use of recycled HDPE plastic lumber for the framing.  In addition, BLC served as the technical consultant to two PHP manufacturers during the development of process conditions to maximize material properties for pre-production test runs.  Section I describes the evaluation of recycled plastic materials for use in the product components.

 

CWC retained the services of Spiritwest Management, of Seattle, Washington, to evaluate PHP’s current marketing strategy for this product, based on the anticipated use of recycled content components and PHP’s long-term business goals.  Subsequent to this analysis, PHP decided to produce ovens as a not-for-profit entity, with a major focus on being cost-effective.  Section II describes the marketing strategy evaluation and recommendations from Spirit West, as well as the plans and market perspectives that PHP has gained over the years.

 


I.          RECYCLED PLASTIC MATERIAL EVALUATION

 

1.0       PRODUCT DESIGN OVERVIEW

 

The solar oven model, the “SOS Sport”, is designed to be a low-cost, easily assembled, lightweight, durable, and efficient oven.  It is comprised of an exterior shell, an inner liner forming an oven cavity, and an insulation barrier between the inner liner and exterior shell.  The oven cavity is covered with a clear glazing.  When the sun penetrates the glazing, dark colors on the exterior of cooking pots and the floor of the oven cavity will transform the light rays into heat.  The glazing and insulation hinder the longer heat rays from escaping the oven cavity.  The current oven design has a recycled polypropylene plastic exterior casing and collar, and aluminum plates for the inner liner.  The unit has a foam insulation layer and a double-glazed lid.  The rigid exterior frame is constructed of natural lumber.

 

Performance Requirements

 

Bottom Line Consulting, Inc. (BLC) evaluated the suitability of using post-consumer PET, including specification of the particular grade and formulation required, based on performance standards for each component.  Solar oven performance requirements are established by the operating conditions and environment in which this solar oven is used.

 

The performance requirements for the oven and the various components are categorized and presented below.  Table 1 provides the performance requirements for the applicable oven components for stiffness, heat deflection temperature and aesthetics.  The remaining specifications are presented in Table 2.


·        Stiffness

·        Heat deflection temperature (an indicator of the maximum operating temperature at which the plastic can perform and not degrade)

·        Aesthetics

·        Impact resistance

·        UV Resistance

·        Chemical Resistance

·        Moisture Resistance

·        Shipping Durability

·        Durability


Table 1            Oven Performance Requirements for Stiffness,

  Heat Deflection Temperature and Aesthetics

 

Oven Component

 

 

Requirement

 

 

Stiffness of Flex Modulus

 

Heat Deflection Temperature 

(Assumed load of 66 pounds per square inch)

 

Aesthetics

Casing:

Stiffer than the current prototype (made from a different virgin resin) which has a flex modulus of 175,000 psi, preferably a minimum of 375,000 psi.

Must withstand maximum ambient heat of about 125° - 130°F, preferably about 170°F.

As clear as possible but UV efficient.

Collar:

650,000 – 800,000 psi; Cannot warp in hot sun, exposure typical of Nicaragua-type climate.  Determined by HDT specification of greater than 300 °F

Must withstand high oven temperatures, up to 300°F or higher.

Black with matte finish preferred.  External texturing desirable to minimize appearance of scratches, etc.

Glazing:

Must not bow at cooking temperatures of up to 300°F.

Must withstand temperature of 300°F (although it is exposed to temperature lower than 300 °F due to the air space between it and the protective PET film).

Black with matte finish preferred.  External texturing desirable to minimize appearance of scratches, etc.

Framing:

Minimum of 200,000 psi.  Unfilled HDPE plastic lumber will generally be about 265,000 psi.  It cannot compete with wood on a strength basis -- the stiffness of most wood is at least 1,000,000 psi.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

 

Table 2           

Oven Performance Requirements for Impact Resistance, UV Resistance, Chemical Resistance, Moisture Resistance, Shipping Durability and Service Life

 

 

Performance Measure

Discussion of Requirement

Impact Resistance

Minimum standard for drop impact strength:  6 feet, or 100 foot pounds, applied to a test unit comprised of the solar oven containing two eight-pound weights simulating the weight of two pots containing food or water.  This impact should result in no breakage, particularly at the outer edges of casing.

UV Resistance

Ten-year life under UV exposure for oven and components.

Chemical and Moisture Resistance

The plastic components typically are not directly in contact with food or oils.  However, the oven should be mildew resistant for environments where ambient temperatures are constantly above 60°F.

Shipping Durability

During shipping, casings are nested upside down and rub/vibrate against one another.  Shipping must not cause damage or scratches.

Service Life

Usage of three to four times per week for four to six hours (or 620 to 1250 hours per year) for 10 years.

           


2.0       SUITABILITY OF POST-CONSUMER PET FOR USE IN SOLAR OVEN COLLAR, CASING, AND GLAZING

BottomLine Consulting, Inc. (BLC) reviewed two comprehensive papers on solar ovens, which provided important background information on solar cooking and ovens[1].  Potential grades of post-consumer resins were identified that would produce solar oven components meeting the performance requirements of Section 1.1, be cost-effective, and compatible with standard plastic manufacturing equipment.  

 

CASING:  Unmodified post-consumer PET for the casing will meet all but one of the performance requirements; the drop impact strength requirement of 100 ft-lb.  The casing on the oven will primarily absorb any impact.  To ensure the proper toughness over the service life of the solar oven, a small percentage of impact modifier must be added to the PET formulation.

 

COLLAR:  During operation, a portion of the collar piece is subjected to high temperature (up to 300°F) and humidity.  Due to the low glass transition temperature of unmodified post-consumer PET, at 170°F, PET is unsuitable for this application.  However, glass-filled grades of post-consumer PET are available for high heat applications.  At 15% glass content, these grades are thermally stable up to 400°F.  Such a material is suitable for the solar oven collar piece.

 

GLAZING:  The glazing must transmit visible and near infrared wavelengths without discoloration and withstand the relatively high temperatures (up to 300°F).  The current design, consisting of acrylic sheet bonded at the perimeter to polyester film, has performed extremely well.  A 10-millimeter air space between the bubble of acrylic and flat film provided excellent insulation across the glazing surface.  The acrylic sheet thickness of 0.093 inches provided a good

 

 

balance of strength and rigidity.  The only problem that has occurred with this component is sagging and clouding of the acrylic when used alone.  This issue can be corrected by incorporating an acrylic that has higher heat resistance, or by improving the design of the double-wall glazing.  Based on the stringent performance requirements for the glazing, no further analysis was conducted for conversion to use of a recycled plastic in this component.

 

2.1       Determination of Process Limitations and Solutions

 

A working relationship was established by PHP with two plastic manufacturers in Minnesota who produce injection molded plastic products.  Both have manufactured the prototype casings and collars for the current PHP oven model.  BottomLine Consulting contacted key personnel at both plants to determine their processing capabilities, and to evaluate the feasibility of running recycled PET in their existing equipment.  Discussions included a detailed review of drying, blending, material handling, grinding, weight feeding, molding, and tooling operations.

 

One facility lacked adequate drying equipment for running post-consumer PET.  This facility primarily molds polyethylene and polypropylene, neither of which is dried prior to molding.  PET is extremely hygroscopic and wet resin degrades rapidly at normal molding temperatures.  Therefore, inadequate drying results in inferior properties, such as reduced impact strength, and increases molding problems such as drooling, sticking, flashing, and splay.  The company borrowed a desiccant dryer from another nearby plastic manufacturer to run the PET test product trials.  PET pellets were used, rather than PET regrind, since pellets have much lower moisture than regrind, and can be adequately dried in a desiccant drier.  (A crystallizing dryer is typically recommended for PET regrind.)

 

Although not a limiting factor with respect to the testing, both molding machines available for the casing and collar molding trials were oversized, i.e., shot capacities were above the desirable ratio of 2:1 to 3:1 of part weight.  This exposes the melted resin to long residence times in the machine barrel, thereby diminishing material properties.  This potential performance-degrading factor was noted as the trials proceeded.


2.2  Formulation Development

 

Successful molding of post-consumer PET requires tailoring the resin chemistry and molding conditions to meet the performance properties at the lowest possible piece-part cost.  Given the performance requirements established above, BLC developed the most cost-effective formulations for the solar oven casing and collar. 

 

CASING

 

The target for incorporation of recycled PET (RPET) in the casing was to enhance performance while using a recycled feedstock.  The key performance properties for the casing are: 

            Stiffness of Flex Modulus                      >375,000 psi

            Drop Impact Strength                           100 foot-pounds

            HDT at 66 psi                                      >130 degrees F, preferably about 170 degrees F

 

RPET has limited impact strength for injection-molded parts.  An impact-modified grade of post-consumer PET from beverage bottles was used to meet the casing performance specifications.  Carbon black was added to provide ultraviolet light stability for the casing.  The recommended blend of RPET and additives must be desiccant dried and kept bone dry until molding, otherwise degradation from hydrolysis will occur.  This type of degradation can result in brittle parts, altered melt viscosity, and changes in mechanical properties. 

 

The injection mold previously used for the casing was intended for a different resin, and did not hold up to a production run using the post-consumer PET.  A new mold is required to be able to utilize recycled PET in the casing.

 

In order to optimize the production run for the casing, settings were recommended for the melt temperature, nozzle temperature, increasing temperature profile, mold temperature and injection speed.  

 


COLLAR 

The target for incorporation of recycled PET (RPET) in the collar was to enhance the stiffness, UV resistance, dimensional stability, and heat resistance, while using a recycled feedstock.  The key performance properties for the collar are: 

·        Stiffness of Flex Modulus                      >650,000 – 800,0